Do Photons Have Mass and Why Does it Matter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evenus1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Photons
Click For Summary
Photons are considered to have zero rest mass due to the principles of special relativity, which dictate that particles with non-zero mass cannot travel at the speed of light. The masslessness of photons is supported by empirical evidence, with experimental limits indicating their mass is exceedingly small, effectively zero. This characteristic allows photons to travel at light speed without gravitational attraction affecting their motion, as they do not exhibit mass in the conventional sense. Discussions also touch on the implications of photon mass in theoretical frameworks, such as gauge theories, which require massless particles for consistency. Understanding these concepts may require further exploration of special relativity and the Higgs mechanism.
  • #31
We think the mass of a photon at rest is zero because that matches the mathematics of the equations we have that model the experimental and experiential data we have.

I don't know if there are other equations that can accurately describe the relationship between mass, energy, and velocity that yield resting photons with an actual mass. I certainly wasn't exposed to any rumor of such in Physics 101 or 102 in college.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Mass is a measure of the inertia of an object, that is the resistance of it against a change of motion. Since light always travels with the same speed for any observer it has no mass, per definition.
 
  • #33
I've had trouble with this concept, too. After all, light waves are bent by the gravitational curvature of space and they impart momentum to objects on which they impinge. How can they be affected by gravity and have momentum, if they have no mass? Chemistry students I tutor have trouble with this as well. The key is the distinction between rest mass and inertial/gravitational mass. This is how I think of it, physically:

To say that photons have a nonzero rest mass is to imply that they can exist at rest. However, QM assures us that photons are the particles that are equivalent to light waves. Like like all waves, light and photons of light, must be in motion. There's no such thing as a wave at rest, so photons at rest cannot exist. Their energy and mass derive solely from their motion. In other words, the notion that photons have a nonzero rest mass is as fictional as light that doesn't move.
 
  • #34
Mark Harder said:
To say that photons have a nonzero rest mass is to imply that they can exist at rest.

Come to think of it, that's not a logical statement by itself, is it? Hypothetically, you could have a particle, system or whatever that does not exist at rest, but might have mass at rest. Also, must anything that exists, at rest or otherwise, have mass?
Sorry 'bout that.
 
  • #35
Mark Harder said:
Also, must anything that exists, at rest or otherwise, have mass?
There are obviously many cases where gravity can be ignored, but everything I know anything about has an attraction to ANYTHING else, especially energy which most of baryonic mass consists of.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
4K