Do Planets Generate Their Own Light?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planets
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Planets do not generate their own visible light; they primarily reflect sunlight. However, Jupiter is unique as it emits more energy than it receives from the Sun, due to internal heat generated from its formation and ongoing gravitational contraction. This internal energy contributes to its complex atmospheric dynamics, including convection currents and temperature variations. Infrared observations reveal that while Jupiter's upper atmosphere is cold, deeper layers are significantly warmer, indicating the planet's intrinsic luminosity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of planetary science and astronomy
  • Familiarity with infrared radiation and its measurement
  • Knowledge of gas giants and their atmospheric dynamics
  • Basic principles of thermodynamics related to planetary formation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Jupiter's internal heat generation mechanisms"
  • Study "Infrared observations of planetary atmospheres"
  • Explore "Convection currents in gas giant planets"
  • Investigate "Luminosity calculations for celestial bodies"
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, students of planetary science, and anyone interested in the physical properties of planets and their atmospheres.

DB
Messages
501
Reaction score
0
Do planets have actual lumosity or are they just lit up by stars? Might be a stupid question but I am just wondering.

Thnx
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
DB said:
Do planets have actual lumosity or are they just lit up by stars? Might be a stupid question but I am just wondering.

Thnx
Personally I do not know but I assume they might have because of some of the chemical reactions that happen on some of them (like the Great Spot on Jupiter). I don't know, to be honest, but I would say yes. :smile:

Sorry. :frown:

The Bob (2004 ©)
 
The Bob said:
Personally I do not know but I assume they might have because of some of the chemical reactions that happen on some of them (like the Great Spot on Jupiter). I don't know, to be honest, but I would say yes. :smile:

Sorry. :frown:

The Bob (2004 ©)
Well THIS particular planet is certainly luminous! It's a big pain in the butt, and I'm glad I live in a thinly populated place.

http://www.pha.jhu.edu/~atolea/second/page1.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you had IR eyes, you'd still see the planets ... and some (most in some cases) of that IR would be from the planet itself.

You can tell how much of the light (or IR) that you see from a planet is 'native' vs reflected by looking at the planet at night ... i.e. looking at the side of the planet that is not facing the Sun. We can do this - from Earth - for Mercury and Venus, but not for the others. Do you know why DB?

Also, even if the Earth had no cities, fishing fleets, etc, it would still be quite visible 'at night' from out in space ... at least some of the time. Do you know why?

Finally, things like aurorae and lightning are 'local' in origin, so ... (But Mercury is pretty dark 'at night', why?)
 
That's Nereid. Always handing out homework.
 
Giant Jupiter...

Jupiter radiates twice as much heat as it receives from the Sun. No other planet comes even close to doing this. This fact is the key to understanding Jupiter's complex and beautiful cloud circulation pattern. There must be some internal energy source, perhaps the energy remaining from Jupiter's collapse from a primordial gas cloud 20 Mkm across to a protoplanet 700,000 km across, 5 times the present size of Jupiter. This catastrophic phase of collapse theoretically started, when the temperature grew sufficiently high to break up hydrogen atoms. The rapid phase may have taken only 3 months to occur, following the 70,000 years it had previously taken to shrink from a more diffuse cloud. Jupiter is undoubtedly still contracting.

The heat emanating from the interior of Jupiter produces huge convention currents. The bright zones are rising currents of gas driven by this convection. The belts are falling gas; the tops of these dark belts are somewhat lower (about 20 km) than the tops of the zones and are about 10 K cooler.

Earth-based infrared observations measure temperatures only 100 K to 200 K in the uppermost atmosphere far above Jupiter's clouds. Yet Pioneer's data at other infrared wavelengths reveal that at a pressure of one-half that of the Earth at sea level, the temperature of supposedly frigid Jupiter reaches a boiling 400 K.

Infrared radiation refveals Jupiter's temperature in the upper atmosphere to be very cold because of the planet's great distance from the Sun, about 133 K (-220 F), on both the sunlit and nighttime sides. At a lower level, the poisonous clouds are warmer. Gaps in the clouds have revealed still lower haze layers with even higher temperatures of around 250 K (-9 F).

Jupiter's infrared thermal radiation is generated by the heat of the planet itself. This figure turns out to be about twice as much energy as Jupiter absorbs from the Sun!. Theorists believe Jupiter is slowly contracting, releasing gravitational energy as heat and radiation. This radiation was most intense when Jupiter formed and has declined ever since to the low level observed today. According to some theoretical models, the core may be over twice the size of Earth and have a temperature around 30,000 K.

Jupiter's Luminosity and Intensity are calculated by reference (3) as:
L_j = 1.05 * 10^17 W - wrong!
I_J = \frac{L_J}{4 \pi dr_c^2} - wrong!
dr_c - Cassini-Jupiter surface range
I_j = 9.83 * 10^(-5) W/m^2 - wrong!

L_J = \frac{L_\odot}{4} \left( \frac{r_j}{r_t} \right)^2
I_J = \frac{L_J}{4 \pi r_J^2}
r_J - Jupiter radius
r_t - Sol-Jupiter distance

Luminosity based upon reference 3 equation and information:
L_J = 8.122*10^{17} W
I_J = 12.678 W*m^{-2}

However, Arxiv information reference 4:
L_J = 8.363*10^{17} W
I_J = 13.054 W*m^{-2}


Reference:
Contemporary Astronomy (Jay M. Pasachoff, 1977)
The Cosmic Voyage (William K. Hartmann, 1992)
http://www.nap.edu/html/oneuniverse/energy_solution_12.html
http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9506055
 
Last edited:
Nereid said:
We can do this - from Earth - for Mercury and Venus, but not for the others. Do you know why DB?

Also, even if the Earth had no cities, fishing fleets, etc, it would still be quite visible 'at night' from out in space ... at least some of the time. Do you know why?

Yes, we can only see the sides of Mercury and Venus oposing the sun because they are in front of us in the solar system.

As for why we can see Earth at night from space, I am assuming it's due to the light of the stars, the light reflected from planets behind us, the moon at the right position would reflect some light on the dark side of the planet.

So know I'm thinking that rock planets generally do not emit their own lumosity, but gas planets can, due to their (as The Bob said) chemical reactions.
 
Inasmuch as they are not at absolute zero, all things, including plants and rocks emit heat, and woud be visible (at least against a background of empty space) if you could see in the IR band.

Now, the *origin* of that heat is mostly from the Sun, although a certain percentage is due to the Earth's internal molten core.

As for actually emitting its own EM radiation, Jupiter is the only planet in our Solar System that actually emits more than it absorbs from the Sun. It is a pretty strong emitter of radio frequencies.

But none of the planets are luminous in the *visible* band, unless you count local, discrete events such as aurorae and lightning.
 
  • #10
You can see the back of Mars if you look at just the right time. But you need to lean waaaaaay out, and a mirror on a stick helps too.

:-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 148 ·
5
Replies
148
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K