Do shielding materials get excited and start reactions?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interactions of shielding materials with radiation, particularly in the context of neutron activation and potential reactions when these materials are exposed to high-energy particles, such as galactic cosmic rays (GCE). Participants explore the implications of using various shielding materials in different environments, including space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe how neutron activation occurs when target materials are bombarded by high-energy neutrons, leading to the formation of radioactive isotopes.
  • It is noted that while alpha, beta, and gamma radiation typically do not activate materials, high-energy gamma rays can induce neutron emission under certain conditions.
  • Participants mention that neutrons can be captured by the nuclei of shielding materials, resulting in radioactivity, but this is contingent on the specific material and energy levels involved.
  • There is a discussion about the potential for spallation reactions caused by galactic cosmic rays, which can produce secondary ionizing radiation and radioactive products.
  • Some participants seek clarification on specific examples of shielding materials that can absorb neutrons and the energy or flux required for such interactions.
  • Concerns are raised about using depleted uranium as a shielding material due to the risk of fission and the accumulation of radioactive isotopes.
  • It is suggested that many elements can absorb thermal neutrons, but the outcomes of such absorption vary significantly among different materials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and uncertainty regarding the activation of shielding materials by radiation. While some points are clarified, there remains no consensus on specific examples or the implications of neutron absorption by various materials.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include references to neutron cross-sections and the varying effectiveness of different materials in absorbing neutrons, highlighting the complexity of the interactions involved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying nuclear physics, radiation shielding, or materials science, particularly in contexts involving high-energy radiation and its effects on materials.

aznsaiyan1029
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
In neutron activations, target materials are being beamed by high energy flux, thus making the target materials excited and undergo radioactive decay. Neutron analysis then can be performed after the materials are "cool" enough by placing inside the hood with enough shielding.

My question is: This may sound silly, but when shielding materials like iron, lead, depleted uranium (<---uranium can be used as shield?)...etc being hit by radio particles from radiations, will there be a reaction occurring at any chance? Like if a shielding material is placed in space and being hit by high energy GCE, will reaction occur? I am confuse about the neutron activation and shielding concept...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Some atoms, when bombarded with neutrons, can absorb one, thus turning into a new isotope. Usually, these isotopes are unstable, and thus radioactive. These radioactive isotopes usually decay by beta emission until they reach a stable isotope. When you put these neutron-activated materials within a shielded container, there can be secondary radiations from the shielding material itself, depending on what you are dealing with. High energy betas can cause additional x-rays to be produced when they knock around the atomic electrons of the shielding material, but these are not nuclear reactions. Most of the time, gamma, beta and alpha radiation do not cause atoms they interact with to become radioactive. Likewise, materials activated by neutron radiation do not themselves emit more neutrons. There are exceptions to these rules though.
 
Last edited:
Adding to what QuantumPion mentioned, ordinarily alpha, beta and gamma radiation does not 'activate' a material, i.e. does not engage in a nuclear reaction. They generally interact with atomic electrons through ionization.

Gamma rays of sufficient energy can induce neutron emission, but that usually requires gamma rays above 1 MeV.

Neutrons can certainly be captured by the nuclei of shield material, and that material will become radioactive.

For galactic cosmic rays, where the particles are in the MeV range, they can cause spallation reactions, and some of the products can be radioactive. Spallation reactions are problematic for spacecraft and high altitude aircraft because of the secondary ionizing radiation produced.
 
I think I get most of it, but according to Astronuc "Neutrons can certainly be captured by the nuclei of shield material, and that material will become radioactive.". May you give me an example of a shield material that can absorb a neutron? (what magnitude of energy or flux?) Thanks,
 
aznsaiyan1029 said:
I think I get most of it, but according to Astronuc "Neutrons can certainly be captured by the nuclei of shield material, and that material will become radioactive.". May you give me an example of a shield material that can absorb a neutron? (what magnitude of energy or flux?) Thanks,

Well you probably wouldn't want to use depleted uranium to shield against neutrons, as you would end up getting some fissions (more neutrons and radioactivity) as well as accumulating plutonium and higher transuranics. Steel alloys contain Nickle or Cobolt isotopes which can absorb a neutron to become Cobolt-60 which is highly radioactive. I don't think lead does anything with neutrons off the top of my head.
 
aznsaiyan1029 said:
I think I get most of it, but according to Astronuc "Neutrons can certainly be captured by the nuclei of shield material, and that material will become radioactive.". May you give me an example of a shield material that can absorb a neutron? (what magnitude of energy or flux?) Thanks,

I believe the answer must be nearly all, if not all, of the elements will absorb a thermal (slow) neutron - some much more readily than others.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_cross-section
You'll note that Boron, for instance has a cross section of 767 barnes, roughly a thousand times greater than Tin. What the nucleus does after it absorbs the neutron is yet another issue - as QP points out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
16K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
18K