Do TOE candidates predict SM parameters?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dmitry67
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parameters Toe
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether theories of everything (TOE), such as loop gravity and string theory, can predict standard model (SM) parameters from first principles. It explores the implications of not being able to make such predictions, suggesting the alternative of a multiverse with 10^500 different SM parameters. Kaluza-Klein theory is noted for its failure to accurately predict SM parameters, while Connes' non-commutative geometry approach is highlighted as a potential TOE candidate that successfully reproduces some SM parameters. The conversation also touches on the relationship between symmetry and asymmetry in these theories, particularly regarding CP violation. Ultimately, the dialogue emphasizes the need for continued exploration across various theoretical frameworks to achieve a deeper understanding of the SM.
  • #31
My bad, octonions...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
no, not even octonions ;-)

octonions are a divison algebra w/o zero divisors; but they are not associative
 
Last edited:
  • #33
Another try. Sedenions :)
 
  • #34
yes, they have zero divisors and are not a division algebra!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K