If there are 10^500 solutions to $ Theory, doesn't that make it bunk?

  • I
  • Thread starter swampwiz
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Theory
In summary, the leading candidate for a "theory of everything"--which weaves together the force of gravity with quantum physics--has a vast, varied "landscape" of possible universes, with 10500 different solutions. If you ask me, there are much more than 10^500 possible universes...but we need a more complete theory to narrow it down.
  • #1
swampwiz
571
83
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If you ask me there are much more than 10^500 possible universes... but let them do their "calculations".
 
  • Like
Likes swampwiz
  • #3
The mere fact that a theory has a lot of solutions is not a problem at all. For example, the Newton equation for a free particle in one dimension
$$\frac{d^2x(t)}{dt^2}=0$$
has an infinite number of solutions. :oldbiggrin:

A more precise statement about string theory is that it has a lot of vacuum solutions. However, here "vacuum" does not mean what someone naively might thought. The "vacuum" means a solution which represents a local minimum of some potential energy. But our ordinary theories, like quantum electrodynamics, can also be thought of as theories with an infinite number of "vacua" in that sense. E.g. every type of crystal (ice, diamond, ...) can be thought of as another type of "vacuum".

Now someone might say that what counts is the number of true vacua. Quantum electrodynamics, for instance, has only one true vacuum, the state with zero number of photons, electrons and positrons. But the so called string vacua, when expressed in terms of fundamental degrees of freedom of string (or M) theory, are not true vacua. The string vacua for string theory are more like different types of crystals for quantum electrodynamics.

Finally, one may object that the true problem with a lot of string solutions is that, a priori, one cannot predict which of the solutions is realized in nature. But again, this is not much different from quantum electrodynamics. For instance, quantum electrodynamics has a solution in which intelligent beings have 12 hands and 2 heads, living on a planet with 2 suns. The theory cannot predict that we, the actual intelligent beings, have only 2 hands, 1 head and 1 sun.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
If there are ##10^{500}## solutions to ##x=y##, that doesn't entail that ##x\neq y##, right?
 
  • #5
Bunk is too strong a term. A better description would be incomplete. Maybe it is on the right track, maybe it isn't. But, we need a more complete theory to narrow it down.

And, what do you know, we kind of have one. The Swampland conjecture and the Weak Gravity Conjecture (more clearly explained in power point form here, at the beginning before it goes beyond the introduction of the concepts, with some references to underlying peer reviewed published journal article authorities) points out that almost all of the string vacua (and perhaps even all of them) can be categorically ruled out because they have one of a small handful of properties that are inconsistent with the observed universe. Specifically, "We refer to the space of quantum field theories which are incompatible with quantum gravity as the swampland. [Vafa, ’05]"

This flips the problem from being one of too many solutions ( ##10^{500}##), to a case of serious doubt about whether we can find any solution that meets this addition criterion.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
11K
Back
Top