user079622 said:
Obviously that's the problem, hmm. So we are in math world.
Newtonian physics is "math world" just as much as GR is. Newtonian physics is just different math, whose predictions are now known to not be as accurate as those of GR.
user079622 said:
so that mean we are still finding what is really happening.
Depends on what you mean. We don't have good knowledge of what happened before the hot, dense, rapidly expanding state that we call the "Big Bang" (which is
not the same thing as the "initial singularity" that appears in some models). We
do, however, have good knowledge of the current spatial geometry of the universe--that it is flat to within a very good approximation (i.e., if it is actually curved, the radius of curvature is much, much larger than the radius of our observable universe).
user079622 said:
So that mean all above members wrote in posts maybe is not 100% correct?
As has already been pointed out, we
never can be certain that anything in science is "100% correct".
However, that is
not the same as saying that we know nothing at all or that we don't know that the naive Newtonian model you have been implicitly using in your intuitions is
not correct. We
do know that that model is wrong, to an extremely high confidence: its predictions are nothing like what we see.