Do We Breathe the Same Atoms as Shakespeare?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shetland
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Recycling
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers around the concept that each individual possesses up to a billion atoms that were once part of other humans, including historical figures like Shakespeare. This idea is supported by Bill Bryson's book "A Short History of Nearly Everything" and further explored through Harlow Shapley's "Beyond the Observatory," which discusses the distribution of argon atoms in the atmosphere. Participants agree on the fascinating nature of atomic exchange through breathing, emphasizing that inhaling molecules exhaled by historical figures is a scientifically plausible notion. The conversation also touches on the complexities of atom distribution in various environments, suggesting that the calculations may be oversimplified.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic theory and molecular biology
  • Familiarity with atmospheric science and gas exchange
  • Knowledge of thermodynamics principles
  • Basic comprehension of historical literature, particularly Shakespeare's works
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of gas exchange in human respiration
  • Explore the concept of atomic recycling in ecosystems
  • Study the historical context and significance of Shakespeare's references to mortality
  • Investigate the scientific methods used to track atmospheric particles
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for scientists, educators, literary scholars, and anyone interested in the intersection of science and literature, particularly those exploring concepts of human existence and environmental science.

shetland
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone,

Currently reading a new book by Bill Bryson, "A short history of nearly everything".

Well, despite the title, clearly even a short history would be a very, very big book, still the read is quite addicting, and there are many scientific areas to which I was quite unfamiliar (Geophysics, Geology for example - Yellowstone is a big volcano!).

There was one instance in the book, that gave me considerable pause - the author "states" that each one of us has up to a billion atoms that were once other humans, those who lived long ago. A specific example used was Shakespeare.

At first glance, I thought, well, yeah, a billion atoms is an infinitesimal number that actually comprise us - and I'm assuming what they are referring to is oxygen/gas that people inhaled & exhaled.

The little know about how dynamic the atmosphere is, not only with oxygen, nitrogen, but even carbon particulates, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that very quickly these become homogeneously distributed throughout the biosphere.

I mentioned this little kernel to a friend, and they asked me if I was a member of a new religion! That this was time-worn cliche, not worthy of the effort to speak it.

The little googling I did, I came up with a book by Harlow Shapley, "Beyond the Observatory", which delineates the journeys of the inert gas argon. We take in like 3x10^19 atoms in every breath, and in one week these atoms are already distributed through the country. And so on...

Anyone have a little more ammunition, er, I mean info, that I might use to supplant my argument?

Shelley
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Originally posted by shetland
The little googling I did...
What you found seems to me to be a pretty good start - and end - to your response. Your logic is impeccable and I suspect that your friend hasn't considered just how small a billion is compared with the size/number of atoms out there for us to interact with.
 
One of my favorites from thermodynamics is that with every breath that you take, there is about a 100% chance that you will inhale at least one air molecule that was exhaled by Julius Caesar in his dying breath.

I also suspect that this calculation is somewhat oversimplified. The oceans, plants, rocks etc can trap atoms for a very long time and this is not accounted for in these problems. I don’t know if this becomes significant or not.
 
Originally posted by shetland
There was one instance in the book, that gave me considerable pause - the author "states" that each one of us has up to a billion atoms that were once other humans, those who lived long ago. A specific example used was Shakespeare.
Interesting that Shakespeare is used as an example of a notion he himself contemplated in Hamlet

Hamlet: (Examining Yorick's scull) Dost thou think Alexander lookt o' this fashion i' th'earth?

Horatio: E'en so.

Hamlet: And smelt so? Pah! [puts down the scull]

Horatio: E'en so my lord.

Hamlet: To what base uses we may return, Horatio! Why may not imagination trace the noble dust of Alexander till he find it stopping a bung hole?

Horatio: 'Twere to consider too curiously, to consider so.

Hamlet: No, faith, not a jot; but to follow him thither with modesty enough, and likelihood to lead to it; as thus; Alexander died, Alexander was buried, Alexander returneth into dust; the dust is the earth; of Earth we make loam; and why of that loam whereto he was converted might they not stop a beer-barrel?
Imperious Caesar, dead and turned to clay,
Might stop a hole to keep the wind away:
O, that the Earth that kept the world in awe
Should patch a wall t'expel the winter's flaw!
 
I think this is true, though I have never personally done an experiment to find out the size of one of these so called 'atoms'. I tend to just take the word of scientists for the truth and assume pressure from th scientific community prevents incorrectness from becomming widely accepted.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K