Does a nuclear explosion in outer space generate space waste at all?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the potential generation of space waste from a nuclear explosion in outer space, exploring the implications of such detonations on the environment and the space industry. Participants examine historical context, effects on satellites, and the nature of waste produced.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that while most components of a nuclear bomb are vaporized, there may still be liquid and solid waste if the vapor does not expand or cool quickly enough.
  • Others note that waste exceeding Earth's escape velocity would quickly leave the vicinity, raising questions about the long-term impact.
  • A historical reference was made to a nuclear detonation at 400 km above Earth, which created an artificial electron belt, suggesting that such explosions can have lasting effects on the environment.
  • One participant argues that the physical matter left behind would likely be in atomic or molecular form, dispersed over a large area, and not likely to coalesce in orbit.
  • Another participant mentions past nuclear detonations in the ionosphere that caused satellite malfunctions and communication disruptions, indicating potential hazards of nuclear tests in space.
  • A link to an external article about capturing atomic bomb tests on film was shared, suggesting further exploration of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the extent and nature of waste generated by nuclear explosions in space, with no consensus reached on whether significant space waste would result from such detonations.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on assumptions about the behavior of vaporized materials in space and the effects of nuclear detonations on the environment, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

petergreat
Messages
266
Reaction score
4
Since all the auxiliary parts of the bomb are instantly vaporized, there may be little solid waste left. However, if the vapor does not expand fast enough, or cools quickly, liquids and solids may nucleate again and cause a problem. Another point is that any waste exceeding the escape velocity of Earth will disappear quickly. So what will exactly happen? Is it safe to detonate a nuclear bomb in outer space without jeopardizing the space industry?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nuclear weapons testing options during the 1960's included the possibility of detonating a nuclear bomb behind the Moon. This would be out of sight (direct electromagnetic pulse) from low-orbit space satellites.

Bob S
 
Thanks for that interesting piece of information. I overlooked the fact that EM pulse is also damaging. However, my question is specifically about whether space waste will be generated. Anyone?
 
When atmospheric detonations were allowed, in the 60s the US detonated a nuclear weapon at about 400 km above the Earth. This created an artificial belt of trapped electrons, akin to the naturally occurring Van Allen belts. My understanding is that this was a "separate" 3rd belt. It was said to have persisted for over 5 years.
 
I do not believe the detonation of a nuke would present a serious hazard in physical matter left behind. Most of the matter would be in single atoms or in molecules which would be spread out over a large area and wouldn't simply collect back together in orbit or anything.
 
There has been a detonation in the ionosphere and caused satellites to malfunction and ground communications stopped for a few hours. After this test there has not been any test in space with nuclear bombs because of the damage caused. I don’t know if the missile test on the moon was nuclear but it would be pretty hard to find water if you heat the surface to a few thousand degrees.
TM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K