Does Adding a Constant to the Hamiltonian Affect Quantum System Dynamics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impact of adding a constant to the Hamiltonian in quantum mechanics, particularly in the context of the hydrogen molecule. It is established that while classical physics allows for the addition of a constant without altering the physical description, in quantum mechanics, particularly in the Schrödinger and Heisenberg representations, this addition results in a mere phase shift. The conclusion is that the physical behavior of non-stationary states remains unchanged, as only phase differences are significant in the evolution of quantum states.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically Hamiltonians
  • Familiarity with the Schrödinger and Heisenberg representations
  • Knowledge of wavefunctions and their evolution
  • Basic concepts of quantum state transitions and energy levels
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Hamiltonian mechanics in quantum systems
  • Explore the differences between Schrödinger and Heisenberg representations in detail
  • Investigate the role of phase shifts in quantum state evolution
  • Examine the effects of constant terms on wavefunction behavior in various quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the dynamics of quantum systems and Hamiltonian formulations.

MadRocketSci2
Messages
47
Reaction score
1
So, I was reading about the exchange interaction, and trying to work out what it referred to, and came across something strange in the treatment of the hydrogen molecule (I think it was on wikipedia):

The hamiltonian given for the system included a term e2/(4πε0 * Rab) for the repulsion between nuclei a and b, even though the wave equation was only for the motion of the electrons, and the nuclei are treated as fixed.

In classical physics, you can add a constant to the hamiltonian, and it doesn't change the physical picture of what is being described. It doesn't matter where zero reference energy is, in terms of the forces on the system.

In wave-mechanics, however, adding a constant to the hamiltonian does shift the frequency of the wavefunction, if not the spatial form of the stationary states. This leads me to wonder about the equivalence of the physical picture for non-stationary states. (time varying states, transient states when the electron cloud is in transition between two energy levels, behavior of free particles, etc.)

(Thinking back to optics:) If you have something like a beam focusing down to a focus point, then diverging - the minimum spot size for a given initial aperture is very much dependent on the wavelength, and here the wavelength seems to be dependent on this reference energy that (at least in classical mechanics) should be arbitrary.

So: Do these constant terms added to the hamiltonian, and shifted frequencies change the system physically? (ie, the way the squared magnitude of the wavefunction moves around, Pauli velocities/currents, etc)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The short answer to your question is "no".

If you are using the Schrödinger representation, where the states evolve, it would simply correspond to adding an additional (and equal) time dependent phase to all states and only phase differences are relevant.

If you are using the Heisenberg representation, where operators evolve, the evolution is given by the commutator of the operator and the Hamiltonian. Since anything commutes with a constant (something proportional to the identity operator), adding a constant does not change the evolution of operators.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
511