dimensionless
- 461
- 1
Let's say I have a four dimensional cube. Would it have a true surface area? I'm wondering if maybe it would have a surface volume rather than a surface area.
The discussion revolves around the concept of surface area in higher-dimensional cubes, specifically focusing on the properties of their boundaries and the terminology used to describe these boundaries. Participants explore the implications of dimensionality on geometric properties, including the nature of flux in four-dimensional space and the distinction between surface area and volume in higher dimensions.
Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of surface area, volume, and hypersurfaces in higher dimensions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise terminology and properties associated with these concepts.
There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about dimensionality, the definitions of terms like "hypersurface," and the implications of these definitions on physical phenomena such as light propagation in four-dimensional space.
Rasalhague said:Would this n-1 dimensional boundary be a hypersurface?
wofsy said:its boundary is not a surface but does have a 3d volume
dimensionless said:Does that mean that a light wave in 4D would have a flux through a volume rather than a surface area?
g_edgar said:Solution of the wave equation is quite different in even dimensions vs. odd dimensions.
wofsy said:Depend what you mean by hypersurface. Explain.
Rasalhague said:I had in mind an (n - 1)-dimensional "bit" of the given n-dimensional space. HallsofIvy's "the n-1 dimensional boundary of a bounded n-dimensional region" sounds like what I was thinking but more precisely worded that I'd have managed. Wikipedia calls a surface a "two dimensional topological manifold". Would a hypersurface then be an (n - 1)-dimensional topological manifold (and is every manifold at least a topological manifold)?