Does cacao powder form another "state of matter"?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the classification of cacao powder and whether it can be considered a solid state, particularly in relation to its ability to sustain shear stresses. Participants explore the nature of powders and their categorization within the broader context of states of matter, including comparisons to other materials.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the validity of the claim that cacao powder cannot be considered a solid due to its inability to sustain shear stresses, suggesting it is made of solid pieces.
  • Others argue that insisting on strict classifications may not be appropriate, citing examples of non-Newtonian behavior in substances like cornstarch suspensions and thixotropic paints.
  • A participant draws parallels between cacao powder and other granular materials, such as fine sand and gravel, asserting that these are also solids despite similar arguments against them.
  • There is a request for references to specific experiments that support or refute the claims about cacao powder's classification.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the rigid classification of states of matter, suggesting that the distinctions are overly simplistic and do not account for the complexities of materials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the classification of cacao powder as a solid. Multiple competing views remain regarding the appropriateness of strict definitions and the nature of soft matter systems.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the limitations of traditional classifications of matter and the potential for ambiguity in defining states of substances like cacao powder. There is an acknowledgment of the need for clearer definitions, but no specific definitions are provided.

lightarrow
Messages
1,966
Reaction score
64
In another forum someone states that "cacao powder" cannot be considered as a "solid state" since "it cannot sustain shear stresses".
Has this statement any basis?

--
lightarrow
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It can, in a very limited amount. That's not the point, however. It is made out of solid pieces.
 
lightarrow said:
In another forum someone states that "cacao powder" cannot be considered as a "solid state" since "it cannot sustain shear stresses".
Has this statement any basis?

--
lightarrow
Is there a reference to specific experiments?
It seems to me that it's probably just the consequence of insisting on classifying things where it's not appropriate. There are so many examples of substances that don't fall into the standard three or four groups. We've all played with Cornflour (I don't mean Maize Flour but I don't know the US term for it) suspensions and seen Non Newtonian behaviour. Then there are the thixotropic paints. Life's too short, imo.
 
I would go with sophiecentaur's signature on this one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: higg's bosom
I think it's a bad idea to argue with people across forums.

You can make the same argument, to a lesser degree, about a pile of fine sand. Or coarse sand. Or gravel. These are all solids.
 
sophiecentaur said:
Is there a reference to specific experiments?
No, for the moment.
It seems to me that it's probably just the consequence of insisting on classifying things where it's not appropriate.
Sure, I'm asking if there is or not a definition like that (or others) about a "solid substance". If there aren't, the problem is closed, for what concerns me.

--
BlueRay
 
Thank to all for the answers.

--
lightarrow
 
sophiecentaur said:
Is there a reference to specific experiments?
It seems to me that it's probably just the consequence of insisting on classifying things where it's not appropriate. There are so many examples of substances that don't fall into the standard three or four groups. We've all played with Cornflour (I don't mean Maize Flour but I don't know the US term for it) suspensions and seen Non Newtonian behaviour. Then there are the thixotropic paints. Life's too short, imo.
I think you mean cornstarch. :)
Is Cornflour a brand name?
 
nasu said:
I think you mean cornstarch. :)
Is Cornflour a brand name?
Cornflour is what we have (always) called the white stuff that is the main consituent of Birds Custard and other sauces. It's a generic term in the UK (what it says on the labels). There was not much Maize grown or sold in the UK and 'corn' was only in Cornflakes or Cornflour; mostly wheat flour has been used. I recently made some corn tortillas and had to search hard for cornmeal - even in health food shops. The lack of gluten made them devils to stay together on the pan until cooked. Cracked it though.
 
  • #10
lightarrow said:
In another forum someone states that "cacao powder" cannot be considered as a "solid state" since "it cannot sustain shear stresses".
Has this statement any basis?

Powders, emulsions, foams, colloidal dispersions, etc. are sometimes classified as 'soft matter' systems: nonlinear, nonergodic, non-Newtonian, etc. etc.
 
  • #11
The idea that solids, liquids and gasses form three distinct phases with huge gaps with no gray areas or fine lines is very middle school. You can buy one micron latex spheres. They come in a bottle, and look like a milky liquid. But each sphere is solid.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
43
Views
22K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K