Does e^{-ix} Have a Limit as x Approaches Infinity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jimmycricket
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit of e-ix as x approaches infinity does not exist. This conclusion is supported by the geometric interpretation of e-ix as points on the unit circle in the complex plane, which continuously oscillate without settling on a fixed value. The discussion also highlights the relevance of this limit in the context of quantum mechanics, specifically in relation to square well potentials and the wave function solutions of Schrödinger's equation, where the wave function outside a well should equal zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and Euler's formula
  • Familiarity with limits in calculus
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics and wave functions
  • Concept of square well potentials in quantum physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Euler's formula and its implications in complex analysis
  • Learn about limits and continuity in calculus
  • Explore the properties of wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the behavior of functions on the unit circle in the complex plane
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics and physics, particularly those studying complex analysis and quantum mechanics, will benefit from this discussion.

jimmycricket
Messages
115
Reaction score
2
What is the limit of e^{-ix} as x tends to infinity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jimmycricket said:
What is the limit of e^{-ix} as x tends to infinity?
What does ##e^{-ix}## represent? IOW, for a given x value, what does ##e^{-ix}## evaluate to?
 
cos(x) - isin(x)
 
jimmycricket said:
cos(x) - isin(x)

OK, so what do YOU think the limit should be, if anything?
 
Well this is exactly my problem, I don't know. Perhaps I should have mentioned that I have considered the limit in terms of cos and sin and I'm not just asking you out of laziness. I would be inclined to say the limit does not exist. The reason I need to know is I am answering a question on square well potentials where solving schrodingers equation yields \psi(x)=Ae^{ikx} +Be^{-ikx} outside of the well which in the region to the leftof the well simplifies to Ae^{ikx} and I was wondering if this is because the wave function equals zero as x tends to minus infinity which implies B=0. I don't know if this is now the right place to ask this but if anyone can help that would be great.
 
I can't comment on the physics question. However the original math question is answerable - there is no limit. You can envision it geometrically as being points on the unit circle in the complex plane. As x becomes infinite the point simply goes around the circle indefinitely.
 
jimmycricket said:
Well this is exactly my problem, I don't know. Perhaps I should have mentioned that I have considered the limit in terms of cos and sin and I'm not just asking you out of laziness. I would be inclined to say the limit does not exist. The reason I need to know is I am answering a question on square well potentials where solving schrodingers equation yields \psi(x)=Ae^{ikx} +Be^{-ikx} outside of the well which in the region to the leftof the well simplifies to Ae^{ikx} and I was wondering if this is because the wave function equals zero as x tends to minus infinity which implies B=0. I don't know if this is now the right place to ask this but if anyone can help that would be great.

Do you know what it means when we say that a function, f(x), has a limit as x → ∞? Never mind the "epsilon-delta" stuff; just give an intuitive description.

Alternatively, think of the graph y = cos(x). Do the y-values settle down to a fixed value as x becomes larger and larger?
 
jimmycricket said:
Well this is exactly my problem, I don't know. Perhaps I should have mentioned that I have considered the limit in terms of cos and sin and I'm not just asking you out of laziness. I would be inclined to say the limit does not exist. The reason I need to know is I am answering a question on square well potentials where solving schrodingers equation yields \psi(x)=Ae^{ikx} +Be^{-ikx} outside of the well which in the region to the leftof the well simplifies to Ae^{ikx} and I was wondering if this is because the wave function equals zero as x tends to minus infinity which implies B=0. I don't know if this is now the right place to ask this but if anyone can help that would be great.

A (infinite) square well potential should not have waves outside of the well. Outside the well, the wave function should just be 0. A finite square well can have a non 0 wave function outside the well, but they should exponentially decay instead of oscillate (assuming a bound state). Recheck your answers.

If you are dealing with scattering states, then the wave function must be a wave-packet, not a plane wave since plane waves are not normalizable.
 
Mark44 said:
What does ##e^{-ix}## represent? IOW, for a given x value, what does ##e^{-ix}## evaluate to?

jimmycricket said:
cos(x) - isin(x)
No, I was looking for a more specific answer, which @mathman gave you in post #6. In my question I specified "for a specific x value," so your response should have taken that into account.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
689
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K