Does Einstein's Static Universe Theory Disprove the Big Bang?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LSulayman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Static Universe
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Einstein's Static Universe Theory and its implications for the Big Bang Theory. Participants assert that a static universe, defined as one that neither expands nor contracts, contradicts observable evidence such as the redshift of supernovae and the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, which support the Big Bang Theory. The consensus is that a truly static universe cannot exist, as it would negate the existence of the Big Bang. Additionally, confusion arises between the terms "Static Universe Theory" and "Steady State Theory," which are distinct concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's Static Universe Theory
  • Familiarity with the Big Bang Theory
  • Knowledge of redshift and its significance in cosmology
  • Awareness of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between Static Universe Theory and Steady State Theory
  • Explore the implications of redshift in cosmological observations
  • Study the evidence supporting the Big Bang Theory
  • Investigate the role of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation in understanding the universe's origins
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, physics students, and anyone interested in the fundamental theories of the universe's origins and structure.

LSulayman
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
"A static universe or "Einstein universe" is one in which space is neither expanding nor contracting." from:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_universe

Does this mean that such a universe has always existed and has always been the same? Has always been here, unchanged?
Because I don't really understand what they mean with static universe.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Yes, that is what it means. But, this isn't true because we observe the expansion of the Universe through the redshift of supernovae. Also the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation suggests that a Big Bang occurred.
 
Kevin_Axion said:
Yes, that is what it means. But, this isn't true because we observe the expansion of the Universe through the redshift of supernovae. Also the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation suggests that a Big Bang occurred.

So according to the static universe there would be no such thing as a 'big bang'?
 
Probably not. Could be, but it's kind of a pointless question since the universe isn't static.
 
LSulayman said:
So according to the static universe there would be no such thing as a 'big bang'?


If by "Static Universe Theory" you mean the "Steady State Theory" then the answer is no.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K