Does every element of order 2 in a finite group have a complement in the group?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter moont14263
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subgroup
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In a finite group G, if every element of order 2 has a complement, then G cannot contain any elements of order 4. The proof demonstrates that assuming the existence of an element of order 4 leads to a contradiction by utilizing the relationship between the orders of subgroups and their intersections. Specifically, the proof relies on the formula |HK| = |H||K|/|H ∩ K| for subgroups H and K. This establishes that the initial hypothesis is valid and confirms the absence of elements of order 4 in G.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finite group theory
  • Familiarity with group orders and subgroup properties
  • Knowledge of the concept of complements in groups
  • Proficiency in using the formula for the order of the product of subgroups
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Sylow theorems in finite groups
  • Learn about group complements and their properties
  • Explore the structure of groups with specific order constraints
  • Investigate examples of finite groups without elements of order 4
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, particularly those specializing in group theory, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of finite groups and their properties.

moont14263
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Let G be a finite group. Suppose that every element of order 2 of G has a complement in G, then G has no element of order 4.

Proof. Let x be an element of G of order 4. By hypothesis, G=<x^{2}> K and < x^{2}> \capK=1 for some subgroup K of G. Clearly, G=< x> K and < x>\cap K=1$, but |G|=|< x^{2}>||K|<|< x >||K|=|G|, a contradiction. Therefore G has no element of order 4.

Is above true? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks right to me, but to understand your last inequality I had to look up and verify the fact that the order of a product is the product of the orders divided by the order of the intersection. So I'd recommend putting that in there. My algebra prof recommended writing proofs so that someone 3 weeks behind could understand.
 
Notice that |HK|=\frac{|H||K|}{|H\cap K|}, for any subgroups H and K of G. Sorry, I could not add it there, but thank you very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K