Does Free Will Exist? A Quantum Physics Debate

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence of free will, particularly in the context of determinism and quantum physics. Participants explore various philosophical and scientific perspectives on whether free will can coexist with a universe governed by physical laws, touching on concepts from cognitive science, biology, and the implications of quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the deterministic nature of Newtonian physics conflicts with the concept of free will, while quantum physics introduces uncertainty that may allow for free will.
  • Others argue that randomness in quantum events does not equate to conscious volition, proposing that feedback loops and non-linear causality might better explain the concept of free will.
  • A few participants propose that free will might be better understood through the lens of cognitive sciences and biology, emphasizing the complexity of human decision-making compared to simpler systems.
  • One participant posits that controlling the future is synonymous with free will, while predicting it does not guarantee control, raising questions about the nature of duality.
  • Some express skepticism about the existence of free will, suggesting it may be an illusion or a comforting idea, while others maintain that it exists to some extent, possibly as a manifestation of the soul.
  • Several contributions highlight the tension between physical laws and the notion of free will, with some questioning whether free will can truly defy these laws.
  • A participant asserts that all events, including mental events, have causes, challenging the notion of acausal free will.
  • There are discussions about the implications of free will on personal agency, with some participants suggesting that free will does not have to be absolute and can coexist with constraints.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the existence and nature of free will, with no consensus reached. Some argue for its existence, while others challenge its compatibility with determinism and physical laws.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the definitions of free will, determinism, and the implications of quantum mechanics, which remain unresolved. Participants reference complex ideas without fully clarifying their positions or the underlying assumptions.

  • #91
....

Does A machine have emotion or something other that it's normal programing afecting it's ations?This force is NOT CAUSED BY ANY EXTERNAL FORCE WHATESOEVER as in the force in question must be completely inside the machine the anwser is no a machine does NOT have anything like emotion therefore you arguing the "Brain is like a machine" is invalid A MACHINE DOES NOT HAVE EMOTION OR ANYTHING SIMILAR THE BRAIN DOES, LARGE DIFERENCE
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92
What if fate exists and everything that has been made on this Earth (be it trees, humans, birds, wasps) has a set purpose in life, and everything anyone or anything does or takes part in is premeditated?
Imagine sitting in the middle of the field. You pick one blade of grass. That was the blade of grass' destiny to be picked by you. Why? because that's how they want it.
What if we are all just like characters in a play, following the script, the stage directions, everything the director tells you to do.
What if you have no choice in the matter?
What if you can not be in control of your own life?
Everthing anyone or anything does however large or small sets off a domino effect.
If fate exists then it may not be concentrating on running your life, but the greater meaning to the world.
What is the greater meaning?
Why are we here if we have no control over what we do?
Why are we here if it is already done?
If fate exists does this mean we are in a loop?
could we be living the same destiny over and over?
Or do they update the program make a few changes to get the outcome they want?
What is it they want?
Who are they?
God?
 
  • #93
"fate" is simply a matter of geometry, speed and forces.
It does not exist
 
  • #94
michelle, i believe we are here because nature is figuring things out.
once again i divide into objective and subjective..

the scientific world is nothing but a means to an end, and the end being giving us the illusion of free will.

the solution to free will lies in quantum mechanics i believe.
if it so happens to be that the quantum world is truly undeterministic, it owuld have huge impact on how chemistry and biology would work.
so if it was undeterministic, we couldn't foresee who would do what.
 
  • #95
Yes, we only have the illusion of choice. it keeps us happy and makes us think that we have a chance to change our future.
 
  • #96
ahhh yes.. another one of THOSE posts. Doesn't anyone ever get tired of these?

It's a stalemate, as it's been proven time and time again. For every point that can be presented to support the case, a counterpoint can be made for the other side. If determinism is true, then free will is a carefully constructed illusion. If free will is true, you cannot prove that you would have made a different choice, given that all events are known. Blah blah blah...

sorry, this is like the 20th thread I've seen in 2 years.

However, if free will were true, I'd will there not to be another one of these threads again :-p
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 155 ·
6
Replies
155
Views
7K
  • · Replies 379 ·
13
Replies
379
Views
53K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 199 ·
7
Replies
199
Views
36K
  • · Replies 190 ·
7
Replies
190
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K