lolgarithms
- 120
- 0
I have heard that the speed of light remains c even if it is not in a vacuum. the light bounces around in the substance a bit, so light appears to have slowed down. Is this true?
This is true on a microscopic level, but not what we tell high school or college freshmen physics students.DrGreg said:When photons of light pass through a material, each photon still travels at c, but when it hits an atom, it gets absorbed. Then there's a short delay before another photon is emitted, at c, continuing in the same direction. So the light gets delayed through the medium and the average speed is less than c.
DrGreg said:That's the over-simplified version, easy to understand, but actually not true in quantum-mechanical terms. For the full story, see the https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=899393&postcount=4
raphael3d said:i wonder how far one can slow down c in various solid state materials and i little thought experiment: what if n -> infinity ? would that imply that the transparent material is so dense, that light would take an infinit long time to pass?
raphael3d said:yes missed it.
many thanks for the link, very interesting indeed.
but it hasnt anything to do with slowing down photons at all, rather using tricks which seem to have the same effect, like quantum beaming, which isn't really beaming, more transforming states. same here.
the bose-einstein-condensate is a bit closer to what i want, but the process is described above...again kind of a trick. it seems to me that photons aways travel with 3x10^8 m/s but with different times of arrival in different mediums. by deforming space too, light follows a longer path, but with the same velocity it takes longer to arrive at some point. the bottom line is in every example longer times in traveling but with constant velocity c
please correct me if i have written ******** =)
kind regards