Does macroscopic magnetic monopole contradict physics?

liumylife · Apr 15, 2012

I know Dirac had said yes to existence of microscopic monopole by quantum theory, so why not the macroscopic monopole?

vanhees71 · Apr 15, 2012

Indeed, there's no principle against the existence of magnetic monopoles. In this sense it's a mystery, why there are no elementary magnetic charges in nature.

However, not long ago, one has found a funny material, which behaves like a socalled "spin ice". In this substance one has found collective excitations (quasiparticles) which behaves like magnetic monopoles. There are a lot of such examples in condensed matter physics!

liumylife · Apr 17, 2012

OK, since the quasiparticle behaves like monopole, dose it produce magnetic field? Does moving "spin ice" produce EMR?

Does macroscopic magnetic monopole contradict physics?

Graduate Horizontal component of the electric field of an infinite uniformly charged plane

Graduate Does a moving particle count as a wave?

Undergrad Why is thermal energy treated differently than other kinds of energy?

Undergrad Measured Spectrum of Stopped Wood Organ Pipe Shows ALL Overtones

Undergrad Is Water's Volume Expansion Upon Freezing an Intrinsic Property?

Insights Revisiting the Velocity-Time Function

Insights Remote Operated Gate Control System

Insights AI Enriched Problem Solving

Insights Thinking Outside The Box Versus Knowing What’s In The Box

Insights Why Entangled Photon-Polarization Qubits Violate Bell’s Inequality

Insights Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect

Does macroscopic magnetic monopole contradict physics?

Similar threads