A Does modified gravity somehow explain galaxies that don't need it?

Click For Summary
Proponents of modified gravity address the observation of galaxies that appear to function without dark matter by examining specific cases, such as NGC1277, which demonstrates characteristics of both rotational and pressure support. The ΛCDM model suggests these galaxies typically show a deficit of dark matter, while Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) indicates that their acceleration exceeds the MOND threshold. Notably, galaxies like DF2 and DF4 are considered anomalies, but their interpretations are complicated by factors such as distance and potential misestimation of their proximity. The discussion highlights the importance of relying on scientific papers over popular articles for accurate information. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the ongoing debate about the necessity of dark matter in explaining galaxy behavior.
user-000
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
How do proponents of modified gravity explain the fact of observation of galaxies, the behaviour of matter in which does not require an explanation in the form of dark matter or modified gravity?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Which galaxies are you speaking of?
 
NGC1277 is a lenticular galaxy, in between being rotationally and pressure supported. ΛCDM says those galaxies in general have a deficit of DM, and MOND says the acceleration is above the MOND turn-on. So both models say the same thing.

DF2 and DF4 are special, but a) AFAIK no other examples have been found, b) the interpretatiom depends on their distance, and c) there is some evidence that they are closer than supposed.

As a PS, popular articles tend to be substantially worse sources than the actual paper.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes berkeman and user-000
"Pop III stars are thought to be composed entirely of helium and hydrogen with trace amounts of lithium, the ingredients left over after the Big Bang. They formed early on, around 200 million years after the universe began. These stars are extremely rare because they died out long ago, although scientists have hoped that the faint light from these distant, ancient objects would be detectable. Previous Population III candidates have been ruled out because they didn't meet the three main...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • Featured
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K