Does nature choose aesthetic colors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jarvis323
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nature
AI Thread Summary
Nature exhibits a tendency to use aesthetically pleasing color combinations, particularly in animals, insects, and flowers. The adaptive value of these colors often relates to their roles in pollination, where specific patterns and contrasts attract pollinators like bees and birds. Aesthetic preferences may vary among species, influenced by their visual systems, such as color blindness in some organisms. Concentric patterns and contrasting colors can trigger innate visual processing mechanisms, enhancing visibility for pollinators. Ultimately, while humans may appreciate these colors, pollinators perceive them differently, often seeing ultraviolet light that enhances their attraction to flowers.
Jarvis323
Messages
1,247
Reaction score
988
I guess the first question is whether it is true that things in nature have a tendency to use good color combinations. It seems to me to be true, when it comes to animals, insects, and flowers, for example.

DF509085-F468-4C1E-B476-A722FF03E99A.jpeg


88C5E647-822A-439F-935F-EC8ACAFEB5C8.png


C6F2B50B-8D7A-4A70-AE0C-7955501C1782.jpeg


Supposing this is true, how/why does nature choose aesthetic colors? Is there a generalization of color aesthetic preferences across a large set of creatures? I guess contrast would be something that might generalize a lot. But there is also a lot of non-contrasting pastel colors in nature as well.

Or maybe we just pick out the nice ones. Are there many examples of flowers with bad color combinations?
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and BillTre
Biology news on Phys.org
The aesthetics of colors is in the mind of the beholder.
And is based upon, among other things, on the visual system of the beholder.
Things would not look the same to someone who is color blind.
You are not seeing everything that other organisms might be seeing.

The adaptive values of particular color combinations will be more complex.
Naturally evolved colors of flowers often serve as guides or attractants for things that are involved in their pollination.
Your 2nd picture shows flowers with a bullseye-like target pattern. It may be further accentuated by pattern of reflected light in the near UV (bee purple, visible to bees). Reds are often for birds I think.
Concentric patterns trigger very common image extraction mechanisms in the brain, like center-surrounds and color that contrast based upon opponent color sets.
There are many mechanisms of vision processing shared among different species.

The bottom picture could be interpreted as the white laying down a path leading an insect to the pollen (nectar (sugary reward) from the insect's point of view).

Spots on animals can have different purposes.
Some are scary big eye spots to put off predators.
Some spots on fish anal fins are involved in courtship/breeding.
Not sure about the ones in the first picture, but they are quite contrasty with the darker background.

Thus, the fruits of evolution directed at birds, insects, or predators can be appreciated by humans.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and Jarvis323
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
2
Replies
86
Views
22K
Replies
28
Views
4K
3
Replies
105
Views
14K
Replies
125
Views
19K
Back
Top