Does nature favour cool computations? News from SFI

  • Thread starter Thread starter StatGuy2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cool Nature News
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a news article from the Santa Fe Institute regarding research by physicist David Wolpert, which suggests that imprecise computations can cool biological systems. Participants express uncertainty about the appropriate scientific category for the article, with some suggesting it may fit better in probability theory or condensed matter physics rather than biology. There is a consensus that the article, published in a less prominent journal, may not attract widespread interest from biologists or the broader scientific community. Some participants acknowledge the paper's complexity and their own limitations in understanding it, while others question the practical implications of the findings, particularly regarding the energy costs associated with achieving low entropy in biological systems. Overall, the discussion highlights the intersection of physics and biology, while also noting the challenges of interdisciplinary communication.
StatGuy2000
Education Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,068
Reaction score
1,161
Hi everyone. I'm not sure if this should fall under Biology and Medical, or under some other science category, but I found the following news link from the Santa Fe Institute (SFI) website, about analysis by physicist and complex systems researcher David Wolpert, which suggest that imprecise, noisy computations can actually cool a biological system. The link can be found below.

http://www.santafe.edu/news/item/Wolpert-nature-selects-cool-computations/

Here is also a link to the actual published article, in the journal Entropy:

http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/18/4/138
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
Curious how I see no reaction at all to my original thread here.
 
StatGuy2000 said:
Curious how I see no reaction at all to my original thread here.
Maybe the articles would be better placed in the probability forum, or classic physics for there is no special thermodynamics forum. Personally I don't understand enough probability theory to give an educated answer. The one who came to my mind which I'd be happy to read an answer from is Terence Tao but I think he is not part of PF.
 
StatGuy2000 said:
Curious how I see no reaction at all to my original thread here.
I don't think the article is of general interest to biologists or the wider scientific community. This fact is reflected by it being published in a relatively obscure journal.
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
StatGuy2000 said:
Curious how I see no reaction at all to my original thread here.

Although it's a very interesting paper and I did save it, I can't comprehend it well enough right now to really comment on it. Introductory physics I & II is often all that is required for biology majors.
 
Ygggdrasil said:
I don't think the article is of general interest to biologists or the wider scientific community. This fact is reflected by it being published in a relatively obscure journal.

The journal that it was published in was related to the analysis of complex systems, but was applied specifically to biological problems (hence why I had posted this in the Biology forum). Perhaps the thread might be better placed under the section on Condensed Matter Physics (of which statistical mechanics is a part of, and much of the journal discusses topics related to statistical mechanics, at least to my admittedly limited understanding of the field) or to General Physics?

At any rate, it's a fascinating article, and wanted to raise awareness of it here on PF.
 
  • Like
Likes Fervent Freyja
Isn't that just saying "if the result is irrelevant, organisms shouldn't spend energy on a decision" on a lot of pages?

Yes theoretically you can cool the system - if you start with a very low entropy somewhere in the organism. Where does that low entropy come from? You had to produce that before, using energy.
 
  • Like
Likes atyy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
14K
Replies
3
Views
4K