Does pH Affect Enzyme Activity in Cornstarch and Saliva?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effect of pH on enzyme activity, specifically examining how varying concentrations of hydrochloric acid (HCl) influence the rate of starch hydrolysis by salivary amylase. Participants analyze experimental data related to the disappearance of iodine color in the presence of cornstarch and saliva under different pH conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant hypothesizes that pH affects enzyme activity, noting that the fastest disappearance of the blue color occurred with water and the lowest HCl concentration, suggesting a trend where higher acidity correlates with longer times for color disappearance.
  • Another participant expresses confusion over the clarity of the experimental description and data collected, indicating a need for clearer communication.
  • A different participant agrees with the logic of the initial post, suggesting that greater deviation from the optimum pH results in increased time for the enzyme to digest starch.
  • One reply questions the results observed at the 0.025 N HCl concentration, asking if there was a significant difference compared to the water solution and suggesting that repeatability should be considered.
  • A participant reflects on their own experience with a similar experiment, noting that a pH close to the optimum range for salivary amylase should lead to faster starch hydrolysis, implying that the 0.025 N HCl concentration was likely intended to test this hypothesis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and clarity regarding the experiment and its results. While some agree on the general trend regarding pH and enzyme activity, there is no consensus on the interpretation of the data or the clarity of the experimental setup.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential issues with the experimental design, such as the mixing process and the collection of saliva, which may have affected the results. There are also concerns about the repeatability of the experiment and the clarity of the data presentation.

Jbreezy
Messages
582
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi, I was working on my lab report and I got stuck. I was trying to get some input please. So my experiment was to put 2ml of cornstarch, 2ml saliva, 2ml HCl. I vary the HCl concentration in 3 test tubes. I have one test tube that is just 2mL HOH. I added iodine in and I watched as the blue color disappeared. Oh I had a 40 minute time cap on my experiment. I'm just having issue with my discussion because I feel like my data was bunk. In terms of fastest time for the blue color to disappear I had 2mL HOH, .025 N HCl. The solutions of .0125 N HCl and .05 N HCl were past the time cap. With this being said I will post what I have written so far. Please help me see if my statements are logical and not out of wack.


Homework Equations



The bold is what I'm most concerned about. This is just my slop copy.


The Attempt at a Solution



The hypothesis that Ph affects enzyme activity was supported. We observed that by changing HCl concentrations we could alter the time it took for the iodine indicator to disappear. Our general trend in terms of least time was 2mL HOH, .025 N HCl. The solutions of .0125 N HCl and .05 N HCl were past the time cap. Seeing as the optimum pH for amylase is 6.7-7.0 (Princeton). It would make more sense to see a trend in which the more acidic the solution the longer the time. For instance the trend in terms of increasing time would be more likely to follow , HOH, .0125 N HCl, .025 N HCl, .05 N HCl. A possible explanation for the trend in our data might be due to the collection and mixing process. Although each of the samples were shook regularly during the timing period the original collection of saliva may have had settling occur. Test tubes containing .0125 N HCl and .05 N HCl may have been mixed first where the
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, but it is a word salad to me. There are patches that make sense, but overall I have no idea what you really did and what data you collected.
 
Well, it seems good to me...grammar's a bit out of whack but the logic looks good.
greater deviation from the optimum pH results in more time needed by the enzyme to digest the starch.
 
Well you have to read several times and then you can guess.

Result of apparently some hydrolysis in the intermediate acid concentration 0.025 N is odd, was thre a big difference between that and the water solution? if others did the experiment see the repeatability.

Reasonable reasoning.
 
A pH close to the optimum range (6.7-7) for salivary amylase should result in faster hydrolysis of starch, that was probably the point of 0.025N HCl.
(I did this experiment in high school- lots of spitting was involved.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K