Does quantum mechanics need an existence operator for unmeasured objects?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rar0308
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concept
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
rar0308
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Before a measurement we don't have any information about a object. So we don't know about a existence of the object. But we are trying to measure something of the object. Is there operator of existence of a object? All operators commute with this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rar0308 said:
Before a measurement we don't have any information about a object. So we don't know about a existence of the object. But we are trying to measure something of the object. Is there operator of existence of a object? All operators commute with this?

I wouldn't say I agree with the bolded part. For example in some quantum optics experiments, we get a signal when the thing we want to perform measurements on (photons) is detected, I am talking about http://arxiv.org/ftp/quant-ph/papers/0611/0611112.pdf" . Actually I can't think of an example where we don't know about the existence of the object we want to measure on. Maybe someone more experienced can contribute here.
 
Last edited by a moderator: