Does Relativistic Speed Increase Gravity Pull?

Click For Summary
Objects moving at relativistic speeds do not have a stronger gravitational pull despite their increased mass, as described by the stress-energy tensor in General Relativity. The Einstein Field Equation indicates that the gravitational influence of an object remains consistent regardless of its speed or the observer's frame of reference. While the specific components of the stress-energy tensor may change, the overall gravitational effect on other objects does not increase. The curvature of spacetime around a fast-moving object does not significantly change its gravitational attraction. Thus, an object moving at relativistic speeds does not gravitationally attract other objects any stronger than when it is at rest.
frujin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello Guys. I am amateur so please forgive me if the question is irrelevant. As I understood it, the objects moving with relativistic speed, have their mass increased exponentially as the speed increases. Does that mean they have stronger gravity pull also?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In relativity the source of gravity is the stress energy tensor. It cannot generally be replaced either by relativistic or by invariant mass. Both are scalars, and the stress energy tensor is a rank 2 tensor.
 
Hi, frujin, and welcome to PF!

Your question looks simple, but it actually hides a considerable amount of complexity. Rather than trying to answer it directly at once, let me first explain briefly how General Relativity (GR) describes the "gravity pull" of an object.

The central equation of GR is the Einstein Field Equation (EFE), which can be quickly summarized in the popular phrase "spacetime tells matter how to move, matter tells spacetime how to curve". "Spacetime" in this equation is described by something called the "Einstein tensor", and "matter" is described by something called the "stress-energy tensor" (SET). The "mass" of the object is part of what is described by the SET.

The key thing about this equation is that it is the same regardless of what coordinates you express it in. For example, if some massive object is moving relative to you, the EFE looks the same whether you look at it in coordinates in which you are at rest, or coordinates in which the massive object is at rest. (By "looks the same", I don't mean literally that every number in the equation is the same--I just mean that the structure of the equation is the same, and there is a well-defined way to transform the specific terms in it from any set of coordinates to any other set.)

So in this sense, the "gravity pull" of the massive object doesn't change when you change coordinates. The specific components of the SET will change, so it will look like the "mass" changes if you just look at particular components, but the overall prediction for how objects will move in the gravity field of the object doesn't change.

There are also other ways your question could be interpreted, but I'll let you respond to the above first.
 
Hello, and thanks for the answers. Unfortunately, I can't understand the reasons ;) - mathematics used are quite complex to me, but I am having now the impression that the answer is: the object moving at relativistic speeds won't "gravitationaly attract" other objects any stronger. Is this correct?

But, doesn't the curvature of spacetime around an object increase significantly as its speed approaches speed of light? (sorry of this is redundant question)
 
MOVING CLOCKS In this section, we show that clocks moving at high speeds run slowly. We construct a clock, called a light clock, using a stick of proper lenght ##L_0##, and two mirrors. The two mirrors face each other, and a pulse of light bounces back and forth betweem them. Each time the light pulse strikes one of the mirrors, say the lower mirror, the clock is said to tick. Between successive ticks the light pulse travels a distance ##2L_0## in the proper reference of frame of the clock...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
931