person123 said:
Could you explain that a bit more? What would the inaccuracies be about discussing it in terms of deformation instead of strain?
See -
http://www.engineeringarchives.com/les_mom_truestresstruestrainengstressengstrain.html
Deformation (displacement) is dimensional, while strain is a dimensionless ratio. At some point, one has to apply a dimension to strain.
During a test under load, a material will deform (strain), which is includes elastic and plastic (permanent) deformation. When a specimen breaks, the material will 'snap back', i.e., giving back the elastic deformation (strain) and leaving the plastic or permanent deformation.
Note that most materials are used well below yield strength, so as to prevent any possibility of exceeding yield during an overload condition (service transient). As stress in a material approaches yield, especially where service temperature becomes greater than about 0.35 homologous temperature, creep becomes an issue, and a designer must consider creep, which is a slow permanent deformation of a material. Think of high temperature components such as gas-fired turbine blades.
There is some convention regarding creep and flow of a material, but I'm not sure how universal it is. Creep usually refers to slow permanent deformation under load where the stress is below yield. Flow refers to a slow, but some what faster permanent deformation when the stress is between yield and ultimate tensile.
Some tensile testing may be conducted at a faster rate up to some level below yield, or proportional limit, then at a slower rate for the remainder of the test. Also, some programs have looked at ranges of strain rate, since strain rate does affect the recorded value of yield and ultimate tensile strength, especially at high temperature.