Does spacetime have potential energy?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of whether spacetime possesses potential energy and the implications of potential energy on the mass of objects, referencing the equation E=mc². It explores theoretical frameworks, including Newtonian gravity and General Relativity, as well as concepts related to vacuum energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the definition of potential energy and how it could apply to spacetime, asking for clarification on terms used.
  • One participant suggests a model where gravity has positive energy density, implying that an object with more potential energy could have its mass adjusted accordingly, potentially affirming the initial questions.
  • Another participant argues that in General Relativity, the concept of potential energy does not function in the same way as in Newtonian physics, indicating that while similar predictions can be made, the underlying principles differ significantly.
  • A later reply introduces the idea of vacuum energy, suggesting that if spacetime has potential energy, it might relate to zero point energy and its implications for the stability of the universe.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of potential energy to spacetime, with some supporting the idea and others challenging it based on the principles of General Relativity. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the definitions of potential energy being used, and the discussion reflects varying interpretations of gravitational energy in different theoretical frameworks. The relationship between potential energy and mass is also not conclusively established.

IvicaPhysics
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Does spacetime have potential energy, and does an object with more potential energy have more mass? (E=mc^2)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
IvicaPhysics said:
Does spacetime have potential energy, and does an object with more potential energy have more mass? (E=mc^2)
What do you think potential energy is and how do you think spacetime would have any of it? Regardless of spacetime, how would potential energy lead to more mass?

EDIT: and by the way, I do not mean my questions to be a comment one way or the other on the answer to your questions, I'm just asking you to clarify your understanding of your terms.
 
IvicaPhysics said:
Does spacetime have potential energy, and does an object with more potential energy have more mass? (E=mc^2)
One way to model gravity in many cases is to extend the Newtonian view and say that there is positive energy density ##g^2/(8 \pi G)## in the gravitational field, in a similar way to the energy in an electric or magnetic field, and that an object with more potential energy has its mass adjusted accordingly (usually by some negative amount relative to some reference potential at infinite distance from the source). This then gives a global conservation law similar to Poynting's Theorem in electromagnetism. In that sense, both of your questions could be answered with "Yes".

A more accurate and general model is to use General Relativity. In that model, potential energy as a concept doesn't really work, although in simple cases it gives similar predictions to the Newtonian model. The energy of a gravitational field in GR is not "energy" in the normal sense but there are ways of allowing for it and expressing a conservation law for something like the Newtonian "energy" using a pseudotensor quantity, although there are varying opinions about which is the right expression to use, as the conservation law does not uniquely select a particular pseudotensor.
 
This looks suspiciously like a vacuum energy [aka zero point energy] question. In which case it would imply this potential energy could somehow be extracted and put to use. In principle ZPE is the ground state of the universe, or the lowest possible energy at which empty space can remain stable. If it were any higher it would spontaneously bleed off into lower energy regions with which it was causally connected. Were it any lower it would leech energy from connected higher energy regions. The consequences of this could be highly undesirable [inimical with life as we know it]. Given that empty space is at least as ancient as the universe, this appears to be a highly unlikely scenario. The universe was in a higher energy state in its infancy, but, that excess energy was exhausted by various processes [e.g., inflation and freeze out into matter] until it reached its current stable zero point value.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
690
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K