Does the Compton wavelength put a limitation on position measurements?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the limitations imposed by the Compton wavelength on position measurements of particles. It is established that one cannot measure a particle's position more precisely than half of its Compton wavelength due to the high energy of the photons required, which can create indistinguishable particle-antiparticle pairs. This indistinguishability leads to uncertainty in determining which particle caused the observed measurement, fundamentally limiting our knowledge of the particle's position.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Compton wavelength and its implications in quantum mechanics.
  • Familiarity with photon interactions and their role in particle measurement.
  • Knowledge of particle-antiparticle pair creation in quantum physics.
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics, particularly regarding indistinguishable particles.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle on particle measurements.
  • Study the process of photon-particle interactions in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the concept of indistinguishability in quantum particles and its effects on measurement.
  • Investigate the role of energy thresholds in particle-antiparticle pair production.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the limitations of particle measurements and the implications of the Compton wavelength on experimental physics.

Ali Lavasani
Messages
54
Reaction score
1
I have read on Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compton_wavelength) that we cannot measure the position of a particle more precise than half of its Compton wavelength, since the photon we would need will be so energetic to produce electron-positron pairs.

How does the creation of electron-positron pairs lead to uncertainty? Does this this fundamentally and in principle limit our possible knowledge of a particle's position?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ali Lavasani said:
we cannot measure the position of a particle more precise than half of its Compton wavelength, since the photon we would need will be so energetic to produce electron-positron pairs.

Not electron-positron pairs, but particle-antiparticle pairs of the same type as the particle you are trying to measure.

Ali Lavasani said:
Does this this fundamentally and in principle limit our possible knowledge of a particle's position?

It limits our ability to measure the particle's position, because if a pair is created, there is no way to know whether the position that just got measured applies to the original particle or the particle of the pair that got created (since the two are indistinguishable).
 
PeterDonis said:
Not electron-positron pairs, but particle-antiparticle pairs of the same type as the particle you are trying to measure.
It limits our ability to measure the particle's position, because if a pair is created, there is no way to know whether the position that just got measured applies to the original particle or the particle of the pair that got created (since the two are indistinguishable).

could you explain why they are not indistinguishable? How does the measurement work when we shoot a photon toward the particle?
 
Ali Lavasani said:
could you explain why they are not indistinguishable?

They are indistinguishable.
 
PeterDonis said:
They are indistinguishable.

My question was, how does the position measuring process using a photon works, and why it can't distinguish between the two particles. Do you mean that we get a result which is correct with a probability of %50?
 
Ali Lavasani said:
how does the position measuring process using a photon works

You shoot a photon at the area where you think the particle is, and watch what happens to it.

Ali Lavasani said:
why it can't distinguish between the two particles

Nothing can distinguish between two quantum particles of the same type (such as electrons). That's a basic fact of QM.

Ali Lavasani said:
Do you mean that we get a result which is correct with a probability of %50?

No, I mean that if a particle-antiparticle pair is created, there are now two particles present of the same type (the original particle, and one of the pair), and there is no way of telling which of the two particles of the same type caused the photon to do whatever you saw it do.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K