Does the Frequency of Gravitational Radiation Alter the Cosmological Constant?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relationship between gravitational radiation and the cosmological constant, particularly whether the frequency of gravitational waves could influence the cosmological constant. Participants explore concepts related to the speed of gravity, the acceleration of the universe due to dark energy, and the implications of gravitational wave frequency measurements.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if the speed of gravity is the speed of light, it implies the universe is accelerating due to dark energy, questioning the relationship between gravitational wave frequency and the cosmological constant.
  • Others argue that the frequency of gravitational radiation cannot be generalized, as different sources emit radiation at different frequencies, making it inappropriate to ask for a singular value.
  • A participant suggests that comparing redshift from black hole mergers to gravitational waves could provide insights into the universe's acceleration, although this idea is met with skepticism regarding its feasibility.
  • Some participants express doubt about the impact of gravitational waves on the cosmological constant, questioning the relevance of gravitational wave frequency to the accelerated expansion of the universe.
  • Concerns are raised about the practical challenges of measuring gravitational wave frequencies accurately due to the superposition of waves from multiple black holes and the limitations of current sensors.
  • One participant notes that while gravitational waves can be redshifted, they argue that light and gravitational radiation travel times are effectively the same, raising questions about the utility of comparing them.
  • Another participant mentions that black hole mergers have significant luminosity, which could allow for frequency determination through Fourier transformation and data from multiple observatories.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus reached on the relationship between gravitational radiation frequency and the cosmological constant. There are competing perspectives on the implications of gravitational wave measurements and their relevance to cosmological questions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in measuring gravitational wave frequencies due to the dependence on black hole masses, which are often not known in advance. The discussion also notes that current sensors can only detect mergers within a limited distance, affecting the ability to measure the acceleration of cosmic expansion accurately.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,411
Reaction score
551
It occurred to me that if the speed of gravity is the speed of light, then the universe must be accelerating due to Dark Energy, What my question is do we know the frequency of gravitational radiation, If we do then any compression or expansion of these waves will change the cosmological constant.

Thank you for your replies.
 
Space news on Phys.org
wolram said:
It occurred to me that if the speed of gravity is the speed of light, then the universe must be accelerating due to Dark Energy
What does "the universe must be accelerating" mean, and why do you expect this as consequence?
wolram said:
What my question is do we know the frequency of gravitational radiation
Different sources emit radiation at different frequency. That's like asking about "the mass of an animal" - there is no such value. There are typical values for some types of animals, but that is a completely different thing.
wolram said:
If we do then any compression or expansion of these waves will change the cosmological constant.
That doesn't make sense at all.
 
This would be a typical representation of the signal frequency of a BH merger.
Chirp.PNG
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
I mean if we take a known source like black hole merger and take the red shift of it , one could compare it to the gravitational waves, if the GW's frequency shortens or lengthens one could determine if the universe is accelerating or not.
 
wolram said:
It occurred to me that if the speed of gravity is the speed of light, then the universe must be accelerating due to Dark Energy, What my question is do we know the frequency of gravitational radiation, If we do then any compression or expansion of these waves will change the cosmological constant.
First, I don't think the second half of that first sentence follows at all. Why do you think the speed of gravity has anything at all to do with the accelerated expansion? After all, you can get the exact same expansion from a Newtonian model of an expanding universe with a cosmological constant, and Newtonian gravity has infinite propagation speed. The speed of gravity just isn't a factor in the Friedmann equations at all.

Second, why would you think that gravitational waves would have any impact on the cosmological constant?
 
wolram said:
I mean if we take a known source like black hole merger and take the red shift of it , one could compare it to the gravitational waves, if the GW's frequency shortens or lengthens one could determine if the universe is accelerating or not.
Huh? The gravity waves are simply redshifted along with the expansion.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: wolram
Chalnoth said:
Huh? The gravity waves are simply redshifted along with the expansion.

That is what I mean we can test expansion by comparing light travel time with gravitational radiation travel time.
 
wolram said:
we can test expansion by comparing light travel time with gravitational radiation travel time

How will that help? They are the same.
 
wolram said:
I mean if we take a known source like black hole merger and take the red shift of it , one could compare it to the gravitational waves, if the GW's frequency shortens or lengthens one could determine if the universe is accelerating or not.
In principle yes, in practice no.
The frequency depends on the black hole masses, in general those are not known in advance - the masses are determined by the frequency spectrum. This is different from electromagnetic radiation, where we can use spectral lines with well-defined frequency.
Even if we get lucky enough to find a gravitational wave source where we have an independent way to measure a mass, the precision won't be very good.
And to make it even worse, the current sensors can only measure mergers up to ~1 billion light years away. That might be sufficient to see the overall expansion, but measuring the acceleration of that expansion would need larger distances.

The acceleration of the expansion has been measured with electromagnetic radiation. A much less sensitive measurement via gravitational waves would be nice, but wouldn't improve our understanding of the universe.
 
  • #10
Thanks for explaining mfb.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb
  • #11
wolram said:
It occurred to me that if the speed of gravity is the speed of light, then the universe must be accelerating due to Dark Energy, What my question is do we know the frequency of gravitational radiation, If we do then any compression or expansion of these waves will change the cosmological constant.

Thank you for your replies.
Actually you r quite right. If you try to calculate gravitational wave intensity at points nearer to a black hole it will be observed that as one moves away from the black hole the intensity decreases.

Now if you try to measure the gravitational wave frequency you will get WRONG answers as there are more black holes and so by superposition principle the waves will superpose to give resultant freq with arbitrary values.
 
  • #12
Agni101 said:
Now if you try to measure the gravitational wave frequency you will get WRONG answers as there are more black holes and so by superposition principle the waves will superpose to give resultant freq with arbitrary values.
Black hole mergers have a luminosity exceeding all other sources in the observable universe by a huge margin.
For periodic sources, you can do a Fourier transformation - it will give you the right frequencies. In addition, you can take the data from multiple observatories (2 LIGO, soon 1 VIRGO, more in the next years) to locate them in the sky and separate sources even if they have a similar frequency.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Agni101 and 1oldman2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
12K