Does the Friedmann vacuum equation have a linear solution?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Friedmann vacuum equation can exhibit a linear solution, specifically expressed as \( a(t) = \frac{t}{t_0} \). This solution arises from rescaling the Friedmann equation in terms of the Planck length \( L_0 \) at a reference time \( t_0 \), leading to a time-dependent mass density \( \rho(t) = \frac{1}{t^2 L_0^2} \). The discussion emphasizes that while the Planck length represents the smallest describable volume in general relativity, it does not necessitate expansion, suggesting that the vacuum energy could be interpreted as a spatial curvature term rather than a physical volume.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Friedmann equations in cosmology
  • Familiarity with Planck units and their significance
  • Knowledge of general relativity principles
  • Basic grasp of cosmological observations and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Weyl postulate in cosmology
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Friedmann equations
  • Explore the concept of vacuum energy in quantum field theory
  • Investigate the relationship between spatial curvature and cosmological models
USEFUL FOR

Cosmologists, theoretical physicists, and students of general relativity seeking to deepen their understanding of the Friedmann vacuum equation and its implications for the nature of the universe.

jcap
Messages
166
Reaction score
12
Does the Friedmann vacuum equation have a linear solution rather than an exponential one?

Using natural units one can write Friedmann's equation for the vacuum as
$$
\begin{eqnarray*}
\left(\frac{\dot a}{a}\right)^2 &=& \frac{8\pi G}{3}\rho_{vac}\\\tag{1}
&=& L^2 \left(\frac{\rho_0}{L^4}\right)
\end{eqnarray*}
$$
where I define the Planck length ##L=(8\pi G \hbar / 3 c^3)^{1/2}##, ##\hbar = c = 1##, and ##\rho_0## is a dimenionless constant.

Now let us interpret the Planck length ##L## to be the size of the smallest volume of space that can be described by general relativity.

But the Weyl postulate, together with cosmological observations, also imply that space is expanding.

Therefore we must have
$$L = a(t) L_0\tag{2}$$
where ##L_0## is the Planck length measured at the reference time ##t_0## where ##a(t_0)=1##.

Inserting Eq.##(2)## into Eq.##(1)## we find
$$\left(\frac{\dot a}{a}\right)^2 = L_0^2 \left(\frac{\rho_0}{a^2L_0^4}\right)\tag{3}$$
where the Friedmann equation ##(3)## has been rescaled in terms of the Planck length ##L_0## measured at the reference time ##t_0##.

Eq.##(3)## has a linear solution
$$a(t) = \frac{t}{t_0}.$$
The scaled mass density ##\rho(t)## of the vacuum is not constant but rather given by
$$\rho(t) = \frac{\rho_0}{a^2 L_0^4} = \frac{1}{t^2 L_0^2}.$$
 
Space news on Phys.org
jcap said:
Therefore we must have
L=a(t)L0​
(2)(2)L=a(t)L0L = a(t) L_0\tag{2}
where L0L0L_0 is the Planck length measured at the reference time t0t0t_0 where a(t0)=1a(t0)=1a(t_0)=1.
I see no a priori reason to assume this. Even if ##L## is the "smallest volume" describable by GR (which in itself is not part of GR, just an assumption based on quantum considerations) this volume in itself does not need to expand, in fact, it should not expand as it is an abstract concept rather than a physical volume.

What you have effectively done is to replace the vacuum energy by a spatial curvature term so your universe is empty. You are just describing Minkowski space.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K