Does the given wavefunction satisfy conservation of probability?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
c299792458
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a wavefunction [itex]\psi = \pi^{-1\over 4}(1+it)^{-1\over 2} \exp{({-x^2\over 2(1+it)})}[/itex]

I want to show that it satisfies the conservation of probability.

Homework Equations


[itex]\partial_t P +\partial_x j =0[/itex] --(*)

The Attempt at a Solution


I calculated the probability distribution to be [itex]P=\pi^{-1\over 2}(1+t^2)^{-1\over 2} \exp{({-x^2\over (1+t^2)})}[/itex] and the probability current [itex]j=ix\pi^{-1\over 2}(1+t^2)^{-3\over 2} \exp{({-x^2\over (1+t^2)})}[/itex]

This gives [itex]\partial_t P = -t\pi^{-1\over 2}(1+t^2)^{-5\over 2} (t^2-2x^2+1)\exp{({-x^2\over (1+t^2)})}[/itex] and [itex]\partial_x j = i\pi^{-1\over 2}(1+t^2)^{-5\over 2} (t^2-2x^2+1)\exp{({-x^2\over (1+t^2)})}[/itex]

But how are they do they satisfy (*)?

tHanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
c299792458 said:
[itex]\partial_t P +\partial_x j =0[/itex] --(*)


This gives [itex]\partial_t P = -t\pi^{-1\over 2}(1+t^2)^{-5\over 2} (t^2-2x^2+1)\exp{({-x^2\over (1+t^2)})}[/itex] and [itex]\partial_x j = i\pi^{-1\over 2}(1+t^2)^{-5\over 2} (t^2-2x^2+1)\exp{({-x^2\over (1+t^2)})}[/itex]

But how are they do they satisfy (*)?

If equation (*) is satisfied then probability IS conserved. And your derivatives of P and of j show just that.
 
@grzz:

Thanks, I know that! The problem is notice how the 2 partial derivatives are not exactly equal! My aim is to fit them into (*).
 
Sorry! I missed the extra t in the derivative of P.
 
@grzz:

Also the extra [itex]i[/itex] in the 2nd expression :(