Does the Immirzi Parameter Determine Black Hole Entropy in Loop Quantum Gravity?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics Monkey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parameter
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the role of the Immirzi parameter (IP) in loop quantum gravity (LQG) and its implications for black hole entropy calculations. It is established that the IP must be fixed to a specific value to align with semi-classical entropy results, as indicated in the paper arXiv:1102.3660. The conversation also highlights the importance of the IP in defining coherent states and the semi-classical limit of LQG theories, particularly in relation to spin foam models like EPRL and FK. Participants emphasize the need to focus on the latest developments in LQG, avoiding outdated references.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Immirzi parameter (IP) in loop quantum gravity.
  • Familiarity with spin foam models, particularly EPRL and FK.
  • Knowledge of coherent states in quantum gravity frameworks.
  • Awareness of the semi-classical limit in quantum gravity theories.
NEXT STEPS
  • Read arXiv:1102.3660 for the official version of loop quantum gravity.
  • Explore the "Extracting Physics" section in the same paper for insights on coherent states.
  • Investigate the mathematical implications of the Immirzi parameter in spin foam models.
  • Review the history of loop quantum gravity in arXiv:1012.4707 for context on recent developments.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and students in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on quantum gravity, black hole thermodynamics, and the mathematical foundations of loop quantum gravity.

  • #61
Perhaps we shall not have a good answer to that question until Rovelli writes a paper on it, because Rovelli seems to be the only guy in the LQG community able to write a paper truly understandable to a wider physics community.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K