Does the Lorentz Force Magnitude Change Between Inertial Frames?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Lorentz force magnitude does change between inertial frames due to relativistic effects, specifically the factor of gamma (γ). In the given scenario, a charge q moving in a magnetic field experiences a force in one inertial frame that differs in magnitude from the force experienced in another frame where the charge is at rest. The transformation of electric and magnetic fields between frames leads to the conclusion that the force on the charge in the rest frame is qγub, confirming that the forces are equal in direction but differ in magnitude by the factor γ.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations
  • Familiarity with the concept of four-vectors in physics
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic field transformations
  • Basic principles of special relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lorentz force law in different inertial frames
  • Learn about the transformation of electric and magnetic fields under Lorentz transformations
  • Explore the concept of four-vectors and their applications in special relativity
  • Investigate the implications of relativistic effects on particle dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the principles of electromagnetism and special relativity, particularly in understanding how forces transform between different inertial frames.

silmaril89
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
Sorry if I should be posting as homework, but it's not homework anymore and I'm just curious about the answer. My question is simple and doesn't require answering the actual homework question I had. If there is a force on a charge in one inertial frame of reference, will there also be a force of equal magnitude and direction in any other inertial frame? I'll put the inspiring homework question below in case anyone is interested in it. Also, the reason I'm asking is because I found in the homework problem, that the magnitude of the force was different, by a factor of gamma. This was not what I was expecting. I thought they would be equal.

The Homework question:

In one frame F, there is no electric field, but there is a magnetic field pointing in the y direction of magnitude b. There is a charge q moving in this frame perpendicular to the magnetic field (lets say parallel to the x axis), and is moving with a velocity u. Therefore in this frame there will be a magnetic force on the charge in the z direction with magnitude qub.

Let the rest frame of the charge q be F'. Find the electric and magnetic fields in the frame F'. Then find the force on the charge in the frame F'.

Here is how I solved it. From looking in a table. I found the electric and magnetic field transformations. I found there to be an electric field equal to [tex]\gamma[/tex]ub in the z direction. There is also a magnetic field, but that doesn't matter, because the charge is at rest. The force on this charge will then be q[tex]\gamma[/tex]ub in the z direction. The forces are in the same direction in both frames, but they are different in magnitude by the factor [tex]\gamma[/tex]. Is this right? I was thinking they would end up being the same magnitude. But then I thought, maybe it's stronger due to length contraction
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Thanks for being clear about the homework-related aspects of this. IMO there's nothing inappropriate in asking this here.

The nice way to think about this kind of thing is that every four-vector transforms the same way under a Lorentz transformation. Therefore the final result of this calculation shouldn't depend on the fact that it's an electromagnetic force. Here's how the force four-vector is defined: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-vector#Four-force Note that its spatial part differs from the force three-vector by a factor of gamma. Under a Lorentz boost, the components of a vector perpendicular to the boost don't change. That means that the *four*-fource is the same in both frames. But since the spatial part of the four-force differs from the three-force by a factor of gamma, I think that confirms the factor of gamma that you found suspect.
 


Thanks for the reply. So it seems that my answer was in fact correct. I think I understand why as well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 101 ·
4
Replies
101
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K