Does the Rejection of Concealed Carry Reciprocity Affect State Gun Laws?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy Snyder
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of the Senate's rejection of concealed carry reciprocity, which would allow individuals with concealed weapon permits from one state to carry in another. Participants explore the nuances of state gun laws, comparisons to driver's license portability, and the broader implications for law enforcement and public safety.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about the differences between concealed carry laws and the transferability of driver's licenses across state lines.
  • Others argue that states have varying standards for issuing concealed carry permits, with some being 'will issue' states and others requiring a legitimate reason for issuance.
  • A participant suggests that law enforcement prefers to know who is carrying concealed weapons in their jurisdiction.
  • There are humorous remarks about the nature of concealed carry, including references to "Schrodinger's bullets" and the idea of open carry as a potential solution.
  • Some participants draw parallels between the consequences of out-of-state driver's licenses and concealed carry laws, discussing the implications for law enforcement and compliance with local laws.
  • One participant notes that without a federal law mandating recognition of out-of-state permits, states can impose their own regulations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the implications of the rejection of concealed carry reciprocity. There are multiple competing views regarding the nature of state laws and their enforcement, as well as differing opinions on the practicality of concealed carry across state lines.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of state laws regarding concealed carry permits and the potential for significant differences in regulations. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the legal frameworks governing reciprocity and the role of federal versus state authority.

Jimmy Snyder
Messages
1,137
Reaction score
21
In a blow to the Copenhagen interpretation, the Senate on Wednesday rejected a measure allowing a person with a concealed weapon permit in one state to also hide his firearm in another state.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32078707/ns/politics-capitol_hill"
Anyone here secretly carrying a gun?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
We can't allow your uber-liberal Scandinavian physics to dictate American policy
 
You'll never know unless you measure my pocket :smile:

I don't see the big deal though, it's common sense to gun owners I know. For example, a shotgun in California isn't allowed to hold more then 3 shells including one in the chamber (or is it 4? :biggrin:). If you bring in a shotgun from another state, it needs to be plugged or probably just don't be caught with more shells then is legal.
 
The defeat of hidden-variable carry...sad.
 
hell nah this thread is funny! hahaa. I just got off from reading those PhD comics for almost 2 hours, **** is addictive!
 
No worries, Shrodinger's bullets are harmless.
 
No, I'm not carrying a concealed gun, I'm just happy to see you.
 
I'm not entirely clear on the issue here. At first glance it seemed to me like it wasn't fundamentally different than having a drivers' license be transferrable between states. Is it just a matter of minor incompatibilities between concealed carry laws?
 
lisab said:
No worries, Shrodinger's bullets are harmless.
Well... as long as you don't look at them.
 
  • #10
just require everyone to open carry. problem solved.
 
  • #11
russ_watters said:
I'm not entirely clear on the issue here. At first glance it seemed to me like it wasn't fundamentally different than having a drivers' license be transferrable between states. Is it just a matter of minor incompatibilities between concealed carry laws?

States have different standards (some times wildly different) by which they determine elegibility for concealed carry permits. Some states are even 'will issue'(I think that's the term) where they will give anyone a permit that meets certain minimum criteria while I think in most states you must submit a ligitimate reason for your having such a permit and issuance is at the discretion of the regulating agency.

Edit: I think, essentially, law enforcement likes to know who is carrying concealed weapons in their jurisdiction.
 
  • #12
russ_watters said:
I'm not entirely clear on the issue here. At first glance it seemed to me like it wasn't fundamentally different than having a drivers' license be transferrable between states. Is it just a matter of minor incompatibilities between concealed carry laws?

Wait, drivers licenses don't carry across state borders? I can't believe that.
 
  • #13
maverick_starstrider said:
Wait, drivers licenses don't carry across state borders? I can't believe that.

You can usually use your drivers license for a period of time out of state but if you stay there long enough to be considered a resident (and this varies from place to place) you must get a new state driver's license from the state of residence.

Edit: but yes, just driving from place to place your license works fine.
 
  • #14
The issue of out of state drivers licenses is an interesting one regarding law enforcement

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driver_License_Compact
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driver_License_Agreement

This sheds good light on the concealed carry issue. Imagine if Montana decided to never penalize drivers who committed violations outside their state. So you speed at 140 mph in New York, get a ticket, go back to Montana, and never have to pay it. The rest of the states would fight pretty hard if they were forced to accept Montanans driving around their state, knowing they can basically do whatever they want, and as long as no one gets killed go home and pay nothing.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Office_Shredder said:
The issue of out of state drivers licenses is an interesting one regarding law enforcement

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driver_License_Compact
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driver_License_Agreement

This sheds good light on the concealed carry issue. Imagine if Montana decided to never penalize drivers who committed violations outside their state. So you speed at 140 mph in New York, get a ticket, go back to Montana, and never have to pay it. The rest of the states would fight pretty hard if they were forced to accept Montanans driving around their state, knowing they can basically do whatever they want, and as long as no one gets killed go home and pay nothing.

Indeed, I think that's the point. Having a driver's license gives you permission to drive in another state, but it doesn't give you permission to ignore their rules of the road and driving laws in favor of the ones from your home state.

As another example, in my state, I'm still allowed to hold my cell phone in my hand while on a call and drive at the same time. However, if I cross the state line into a state that does not permit being on the cell phone without a hands-free earpiece thing, I better disconnect that call or switch to a hands-free device. I don't get to tell the cop stopping me that I am allowed to hold the phone at home so need to be allowed to hold it in their state.
 
  • #16
lisab said:
No worries, Shrodinger's bullets are harmless.
Are you sure? What if they are indeterminate and take all possible paths through you?
 
  • #17
I doubt that the laws of any state can directly impose restrictions on another state. I note that PA will not recognize an out-of-state driver's license of someone who has lived in PA for 60 days, while in FL, it's 30 days. Perhaps there is no Federal law that forces a state to recognize out-of-state licenses, or perhaps the Federal law provides for a minimum but not a maximum grace period. The key issue is that without a Federal law, states can do what they want. Was it not for this very reason that the bill was introduced in the Senate in the first place?

Edit: or that states have agreed among themselves without involving the Feds.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 89 ·
3
Replies
89
Views
15K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 169 ·
6
Replies
169
Views
21K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
12K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K