MHB Does the series with increasing numerators converge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series Sum
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
Find the sum for the series

$$\frac{5}{3}+2+\frac{12}{5}+...$$
This equals

$$\frac{25}{15}+\frac{30}{15}+\frac{36}{15}+...$$

So the numerator increases by 4+k from the previous numerator
But unable to set up
$$\sum_{k+1}^{\infty}f(x)$$
The series should go to $\infty$ since the terms only increase in size
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Correct, the series diverges.
 
karush said:
Find the sum for the series

$$\frac{5}{3}+2+\frac{12}{5}+...$$
This equals

$$\frac{25}{15}+\frac{30}{15}+\frac{36}{15}+...$$

So the numerator increases by 4+k from the previous numerator
But unable to set up
$$\sum_{k+1}^{\infty}f(x)$$
The series should go to $\infty$ since the terms only increase in size

Given that the numerator increases linearly, we know it will be a quadratic function and so the $n$th term in the series will have the form:

$$a_n=\frac{an^2+bn+c}{15}$$

Using the given initial values, the following 3X3 linear system arises:

$$a+b+c=25$$

$$4a+2b+c=30$$

$$9a+3b+c=36$$

Solving this system, we obtain:

$$(a,b,c)=\left(\frac{1}{2},\frac{7}{2},21\right)$$

And so we have the $n$th term:

$$a_n=\frac{n^2+7n+42}{30}$$

Hence, the $n$th sum of the series is given by:

$$S_n=\sum_{k=1}^n\left(a_k\right)=\frac{1}{30}\left(\sum_{k=1}^n\left(k^2+7k+42\right)\right)=\frac{1}{30}\left(\sum_{k=1}^n\left(k^2\right)+7\sum_{k=1}^n(k)+42\sum_{k=1}^n(1)\right)$$

Now, using the following formulas:

$$\sum_{k=1}^n\left(k^2\right)=\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}$$

$$\sum_{k=1}^n\left(k\right)=\frac{n(n+1)}{2}$$

$$\sum_{k=1}^n\left(1\right)=n$$

We may now state:

$$S_n=\frac{1}{30}\left(\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}+\frac{7n(n+1)}{2}+42n\right)=\frac{n}{180}\left((n+1)(2n+1)+21(n+1)+252\right)$$

Expanding, combining like terms and factoring, we finally obtain:

$$S_n=\frac{n}{90}\left(n^2+12n+137\right)$$

And so we find:

$$S_{\infty}=\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(S_n\right)=\infty$$
 
karush said:
Find the sum for the series: \frac{5}{3}+2+\frac{12}{5}+ \cdots
This equals: \frac{25}{15}+\frac{30}{15}+\frac{36}{15}+\cdots
So the numerator increases by 4+k from the previous numerator , but unable to set up \sum_{k+1}^{\infty}f(x)
The series should go to $\infty$ since the terms only increase in size

I saw a different series.

\frac{5}{3} + 2 + \frac{12}{5} + \cdots \;=\;\frac{5}{3} + \frac{8}{4} + \frac{12}{5} + \cdots \;=\;\sum^{\infty}_{n=1} \frac{n^2+3n+6}{2(n+2)} . . . which also diverges.

 
You should see immediately that the individual terms do not go to 0 so the series does not converge.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top