Does the transfer function exist for an unforced system?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence of a transfer function for an unforced system, specifically in the context of a mass-spring-damper system. Participants explore the definitions and implications of transfer functions in scenarios where no external input is applied, examining both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether a transfer function can exist without an actual input, noting that the standard definition involves output/input ratios.
  • Others argue that the transfer function can be defined based on system properties, independent of current inputs, suggesting it describes potential system responses.
  • One participant emphasizes that while the transfer function conceptually exists, it cannot be calculated without specifying an input.
  • There is mention of the need for clear definitions regarding where inputs and outputs are applied in the system to properly determine the transfer function.
  • Some participants propose that the transfer function can be derived from the system's differential equation, even if the system is not currently excited.
  • Discussions include hypothetical inputs and the implications of defining transfer functions in the absence of explicit driving forces.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of transfer functions to unforced systems. While some assert that transfer functions exist independently of inputs, others contend that the lack of a defined input makes the concept less applicable. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the problem statement, particularly the absence of specified inputs and outputs, which complicates the determination of the transfer function. Participants note that assumptions about inputs and outputs are necessary for a complete analysis.

EastWindBreaks
Messages
128
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



upload_2018-12-20_6-27-9.png

c is the coefficient of damping, k is the spring constant, and m is the mass.
if the cart is displaced from rest by distance X_0 and released at t=0 with initial velocity v_0=1.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok this might be a stupid question because I wasn't able to find a similar question like this anywhere, this question just pops into my mind when I was solving for transfer functions on a system with a force input. I think I am still a little confused on the definitions. So I found it's equation of motion in time and Laplace domain, but if I were asked to find the transfer function of the plant, does it exists? since G(s)= output/ input, as far as I see here, there is no input since it was released at t=0, if it has an input, I can just take the X(s)/ input(s). Can someone please confirm my understanding?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-12-20_6-27-9.png
    upload_2018-12-20_6-27-9.png
    5 KB · Views: 937
Physics news on Phys.org
EastWindBreaks said:
the transfer function of the plant, does it exist?
Of course it does. It exists independent of the fact that an actual input is applied or not.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EastWindBreaks
BvU said:
Of course it does. It exists independent of the fact that an actual input is applied or not.
Thank you, I thought the plant transfer function G_p(s) = output(s) / input(s)? how it is independent? are you saying that it always exists but cannot be calculated without some type of inputs?
 
You can calculate an amplitude and phase response for your system under a driving force of the type ##F_0\sin(\omega t)## even if it stands still in the lab. To validate your model, you'd need an actual input. But that's a different story.
 
EastWindBreaks said:
Thank you, I thought the plant transfer function G_p(s) = output(s) / input(s)? how it is independent? are you saying that it always exists but cannot be calculated without some type of inputs?
For the problem in your original post, the transfer function concept doesn't apply because there is no input to the system.

But you could take the same system and add a driving force to it, and then the transfer function idea makes sense. For a linear, time-invariant system, you can figure out the transfer function by looking at the differential equation that describes the (forced) system. The output y(t) of a system will obviously depend upon the input x(t), but the ratio Y(s)/X(s) is independent of the input and depends only on the system.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
The transfer function describes the dynamics of a system (usually a linear system), without regard to whether it is excited at the present moment. i.e. How would the system respond if it were excited. In finding the transfer function you don't need any information about the input, just system properties like mass, inductance, density, etc.
So, for example, we can talk about the resonant frequency of a guitar string even when it is quiet.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rude man
IMHO, the problem is not well defined. One can hypothesize inputs of various types/locations, but none is specified in the problem statement.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
FactChecker said:
IMHO, the problem is not well defined. One can hypothesize inputs of various types, but none is specified in the problem statement.
The problem isn't well defined in the sense that there is nothing being asked in the problem statement. :smile:
But in the 'attempt at solution':rolleyes: the OP asks about a transfer function -- while mentally still busy with
EastWindBreaks said:
transfer functions on a system with a force input
and such a transfer function can definitely be determined for the system in the exercise.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rude man
BvU said:
The problem isn't well defined in the sense that there is nothing being asked in the problem statement. :smile:
But in the 'attempt at solution':rolleyes: the OP asks about a transfer function -- while mentally still busy with
and such a transfer function can definitely be determined for the system in the exercise.
This is not my specialty. What point is an input signal applied at and where is the output measured? Are there traditional input/output for this problem? I think that is necessary to determine the transfer function.
 
  • #10
FactChecker said:
This is not my specialty. What point is an input signal applied at and where is the output measured? Are there traditional input/output for this problem? I think that is necessary to determine the transfer function.
Without further specifications given, there is one obvious target object in the image and that would be the mass-on-wheels. We might be interested in its position or velocity (or both) with respect to time when some driving force f(t) is applied.
upload_2018-12-21_10-48-20.png

f(t) itself can be left unspecified when finding the transfer function. Just represent it as F(s) in the Laplace domain, and then the transfer function might be obtained by finding, for example, ##H(s) = \frac{V(s)}{F(s)} = \{something\}##
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-12-21_10-48-20.png
    upload_2018-12-21_10-48-20.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 739
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
  • #11
gneill said:
Without further specifications given, there is one obvious target object in the image and that would be the mass-on-wheels. We might be interested in its position or velocity (or both) with respect to time when some driving force f(t) is applied.
View attachment 236148
f(t) itself can be left unspecified when finding the transfer function. Just represent it as F(s) in the Laplace domain, and then the transfer function might be obtained by finding, for example, ##H(s) = \frac{V(s)}{F(s)} = \{something\}##
That certainly is what I would normally assume as an input. And I would assume the output is position, although there are other options.
 
  • #12
FactChecker said:
That certainly is what I would normally assume as an input. And I would assume the output is position, although there are other options.
Yup, and it's simple enough to integrate or differentiate in the Laplace domain.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
  • #13
gneill said:
Yup, and it's simple enough to integrate or differentiate in the Laplace domain.
Good point.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K