Does the Wave Function Approach Zero at Infinity?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of wave functions and their derivatives at infinity, specifically in the context of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. It is established that if a wave function Ψ approaches zero as x approaches ±∞, its derivative must also approach zero at infinity, assuming the wave function is normalized and the potential function is real. The participants suggest verifying this by calculating the derivative of a specific wave function, such as Ψ(x) = (Asin²x)/√(x²+1), and using integration by parts to demonstrate that the boundary terms vanish. This leads to the conclusion that the temporal derivative of the inner product of two wave functions remains zero under these conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation
  • Knowledge of wave function normalization
  • Familiarity with integration by parts
  • Concept of limits in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of normalized wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of boundary conditions in quantum systems
  • Study integration techniques in the context of quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the role of potential functions in the Schrödinger equation
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists analyzing wave functions, and anyone studying the implications of boundary conditions in quantum systems.

thatguy14
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If I have a wave function that goes to infinity can I assume that the derivative also goes to 0 at infinity?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


The reason I think it does is because the wavefunction and its derivative must be continuous everywhere except at potentials that go to infinity. Is this the correct logic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, this is a little too little information. What is the equation for your wavefunction?
 
We aren't given any. Some other information which might be helpful though, the wave function is normalized, it is a solution to the time dependent Schrödinger equation and the potential function is real. And again it approaches zero as x goes to +- infinity. Is that enough?
 
Just that in general the most sure way to decide is to calculate. So, what you should do is write down a wavefunction that satisfies the conditions and see what happens if you differentiate it under your stated conditions.

For example, try to solve this one, you will find it interesting:

\psi(x) = \frac{Asin^{2}x}{\sqrt{x^{2}+1}}
 
I think I see what you are saying. I will give a little more information into what I am trying to do.

The question is:

Consider two normalizable wave functions Ψ1(x, t) and Ψ2(x, t), both of which are solutions
of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. Assume that the potential function is real.
The functions are normalized, and the functions both approach zero as x goes to ±∞.

Show that these propeties can be used to prove that

\frac{d}{dt} \int_{-∞}^{∞} Ψ1*(x, t)Ψ2(x, t)dx = 0

We get a hint to conert the temporal derivative to the spatial dertivative using the time-dependent Schrödinger equation and you get:

\frac{i\bar{h}}{2m} \int_{-∞}^{∞} Ψ1*(x, t)\frac{d^2}{dx^2}Ψ2(x, t) - Ψ2(x, t)\frac{d^2}{dx^2}Ψ1*(x, t)

Then using integration by parts you entually get a term (for one part of the integral) that is

Ψ1*(x, t)\frac{d}{dx}Ψ2(x, t) |^{∞}_{-∞}

and I need that to go to 0 or else the rest doesn't really follow through correctly. I justified it by saying that since Ψ2(x, t) goes to 0 and +- infinity then its derivative will go to 0 and +- infinity.
 
Well, as far as I know, in general it is assumed that

Lim(x \rightarrow ∞) \frac{∂^{n}ψ}{∂x^{n}} = 0

where n is some positive integer

but it does not necessarily have to be the case. As far as I know it is only an assumption.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Okay thank you. I think it is sufficient for my course. I appreciate your time!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K