Does This Line Integral Depend Only on Its End Points?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bugatti79
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Points
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
bugatti79
Messages
786
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



Show that the following line integral depends only on the end points of C by using a suitable theorem.

Then evaluate without parameterising it.

Homework Equations



[itex]\int_{(0,0)}^{(3,2)} 2xe^y dx + x^2e^y dy[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Is this the theorem...

[itex]\displaystyle \int F(x,y) dr =\int_C \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x} dx +\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial y} dy =\int_a^b (\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x} \frac{dx}{dt} +\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial y} \frac{dy}{dt}) dt[/itex]...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lanedance said:
do you know about conservative functions and vector fields ?

Yes, this force vector field is conservative because g_x=f_y, hence is independent of path C..but I don't know what theorem to use?
 
lanedance said:
how about the gradient theorem

It must be simpler than I thought

I calculate the potential function [itex]\phi (x,y)= x^2 e^y +C[/itex]. we know the gradient of the potential function is the force vector field given in the question. I integrated backwards to get the potential, s I guess that's the theorem..right?

I evaluate the force field to be 9e^2...based on [itex]\displaystyle \int \nabla \phi \dot dr = \phi(x_1, y_1) - \phi (x_0, y_0)[/itex]...