Does this paragraph about a falling cup make sense?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a falling cup that contains a mass at the bottom, specifically focusing on how the cup repositions itself during free fall. The original poster describes an experiment involving a cup, cotton, and an egg, and raises questions about the explanation of the cup's motion and orientation while falling.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the role of mass distribution in the cup's behavior during free fall and suggest using torque to explain the observed phenomena. Questions are raised about the effects of gravity and air drag on the cup's orientation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the explanation using torque, while others are seeking clarification on the concept of torque itself. The discussion is exploring different interpretations of the forces acting on the cup.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a test drop and the effects of air drag, as well as the need for a clearer explanation of the physical principles involved. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the appropriateness of their explanation.

TheExibo
Messages
55
Reaction score
1
A cup with a mass/weight at the bottom was filled with cotton and an egg was place inside for a physics project. As the cup was falling, it would always re position itself to fall with the bottom/heavier half first (the bottom contains the mass). Would it make sense to explain this case this way:

After a test drop with a plastic egg, the plastic cup had tipped over and landed on its side. This issue was resolved by placing a mass at the center of the bottom of a second cup, and placing the first cup on top. Because the bottom half of the device was now heavier, it would be less affected by air drag than the top half, and the egg-helmet would always position itself in mid-air with the heavier half at the bottom. This repositioning was a result of the collision with the cup and all the stationary air molecules in the way. The half with more mass will have more momentum to spare among the air molecules that it encounters, thus maintaining more speed than the lighter half.

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's sort of right, but it would be better to explain it in terms of torque. Imagine the cup tilted somewhat while falling. Draw where you think the forces of gravity and drag will act.
 
haruspex said:
It's sort of right, but it would be better to explain it in terms of torque. Imagine the cup tilted somewhat while falling. Draw where you think the forces of gravity and drag will act.

How would you explain it using torque? I'm not familiar with what it is.
 
TheExibo said:
How would you explain it using torque? I'm not familiar with what it is.
Torque means a twisting force. If you have equal and opposite forces, but in different 'lines of action', the result will be a tendency to twist the object they're acting on.
In the case of this cup, as you say, the mass is concentrated towards the bottom, but the drag is not. Just draw a picture of a tilted rectangle with the drag acting upwards in the middle, but gravity acting downwards near the bottom end. Do you see the twisting effect?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
9K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
19K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K