Does Voltage at Point P Reflect Net Attraction Despite Equal Charges?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mm2424
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Voltage
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the net electrical potential at a specific point due to multiple charges, specifically focusing on the interpretation of voltage in the context of equal positive charges. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the nature of electrical potential as a scalar quantity and its implications when considering the contributions from multiple charges.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how to interpret the voltage at point P when only positive charges are present, questioning whether the potentials from these charges cancel or add up. Other participants confirm that potentials add due to the superposition principle, leading to further inquiries about specific scenarios involving equidistant charges.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring the implications of voltage being a scalar and how it relates to the presence of multiple charges. Guidance has been provided regarding the addition of potentials, but questions remain about the interpretation of these results in specific configurations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating assumptions about the behavior of electrical potential in the presence of equal charges and the implications of superposition in their calculations. There is an acknowledgment of the original poster's confusion regarding the relationship between potential and net attraction.

mm2424
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the net electrical potential at point P due to the four particles if V = 0 at infinity, q = 5 fC and d = 4 cm? The image for this problem can be seen at http://www.webassign.net/hrw/hrw7_24-33.gif

Homework Equations



Potential = 1/(4εpi) * q/r

The Attempt at a Solution



I was able to answer this question, and the answer agrees with the answer key. However, it's left me a bit confused. Potential is a scalar, correct? How does one interpret the meaning of the voltage for point P if, say, only the two +q charges were present. Do the voltages cancel out, or do they add up? I ask because, when I answered this problem, I just blindly added up all the potentials at point P from each charge, regardless of the charges' location. I added the pluses, subtracted the minuses, and got the right answer (which ends up being .54 mV). But does that mean that there is a net positive attraction for the particle? I don't see how that makes sense, since the electrical fields from the positive charges should cancel, no? I imagine I'm looking at this the wrong way...any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mm2424 said:
I was able to answer this question, and the answer agrees with the answer key. However, it's left me a bit confused. Potential is a scalar, correct? How does one interpret the meaning of the voltage for point P if, say, only the two +q charges were present. Do the voltages cancel out, or do they add up?

The potentials add. Potential obeys the superposition rule, so you can treat one sourtce at a time and sum the contributions of each.
 
So if you had a point that was equidistant between two equal positive charges q, the voltage would be positive and not 0?
 
mm2424 said:
So if you had a point that was equidistant between two equal positive charges q, the voltage would be positive and not 0?

Yes. The potential (a scalar) would be the sum of the contributions from each charge, both of which are positive.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K