A Double double slit experiment and path information

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the double-slit experiment and the effects of path information on interference patterns. It explains that when all impacts are conserved, no interference is observed, but selecting specific impacts can create an interference pattern. If the left screen is positioned at the slits, full path information results in no interference on the right. The conversation also explores how to select impacts to mimic conditions where one slit is closed, achieving minimal interference. Ultimately, it concludes that a specific subset of impacts can effectively cancel contributions from both slits, leading to a zero interference pattern.
Heidi
Messages
420
Reaction score
40
Hi Pfq
My question is about this experiment:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-68181-1
(the link was given by DrChinese.
If all the impacts are conserved no interference can be seen on the screens.
but if we only take the impacts (Y, yi) where Y is always at the same position on the left screen
the yi will give an interferentce pattern (not always withe a perfect fringe visibility.
if the left screen is in the plane of the slits, and Y is on one slit we will have a full path information and no interference pattern on the right. same thing if Y is on the other slit:
if we superpose these two patterns we will get the "bullet" pattern.
suppose now that the left screen is at a given distance behind the left screen.
Is there a subset of the Y impacts on the left screen so that the yi would mimick the case where one of the right slit is not open (always the same)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, there is a subset of the Y impacts on the left screen so that the yi would mimic the case where one of the right slit is not open. This can be achieved by choosing the Y impacts such that the interference pattern on the right screen is minimized. To do this, the Y impacts should be chosen to cancel out the contributions from the two slits so that the total interference pattern is zero.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...