MHB Double integral of general region

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating the double integral of the function \(xy\) over the region \(D\) defined by the lines \(y=x\), \(y=2x-2\), and \(y=0\). The user initially set up the \(dx\,dy\) integral correctly, yielding an answer of \(\frac{1}{6}\), but struggled with the \(dy\,dx\) integral, which resulted in an incorrect value of \(\frac{-38}{8}\). After further analysis, it was determined that the user had made errors in both integrals, particularly in plotting the boundaries of the region. Correcting these mistakes led to consistent results of \(\frac{5}{6}\) for both integral setups. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately defining the region of integration in double integrals.
skate_nerd
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
This problem has brought something up that's making my brain wrinkle. It says to find the integral for
$$\int_{ }^{ }\int_{D}^{ }xy\,dA$$
where \(D\) is the region bounded by \(y=x\), \(y=2x-2\), \(y=0\). I have to find the \(dx\,dy\) integral and then find the \(dy\,dx\) integral and evaluate the simpler one.
I sketched the region which was easy enough and then found the easier of the two orders which was the \(dx\,dy\) integral and I got
$$\int_{0}^{2}\int_{y}^{\frac{y+2}{2}}xy\,dx\,dy$$
This evaluates to \(\frac{1}{6}\).
However I tried for the \(dy\,dx\) integral
$$\int_{0}^{2}\int_{2x-2}^{x}xy\,dy\,dx$$
and got the answer \(\frac{-38}{8}\) which definitely doesn't make sense. Where am I going wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: double integral of general region

skatenerd said:
This problem has brought something up that's making my brain wrinkle. It says to find the integral for
$$\int_{ }^{ }\int_{D}^{ }xy\,dA$$
where \(D\) is the region bounded by \(y=x\), \(y=2x-2\), \(y=0\). I have to find the \(dx\,dy\) integral and then find the \(dy\,dx\) integral and evaluate the simpler one.
I sketched the region which was easy enough and then found the easier of the two orders which was the \(dx\,dy\) integral and I got
$$\int_{0}^{2}\int_{y}^{\frac{y+2}{2}}xy\,dx\,dy$$
This evaluates to \(\frac{1}{6}\).
However I tried for the \(dy\,dx\) integral
$$\int_{0}^{2}\int_{2x-2}^{x}xy\,dy\,dx$$
and got the answer \(\frac{-38}{8}\) which definitely doesn't make sense. Where am I going wrong?

Your bounds are correct, so it must be with your integration. What did you do?
 
Re: double integral of general region

skatenerd said:
This problem has brought something up that's making my brain wrinkle. It says to find the integral for
$$\int_{ }^{ }\int_{D}^{ }xy\,dA$$
where \(D\) is the region bounded by \(y=x\), \(y=2x-2\), \(y=0\). I have to find the \(dx\,dy\) integral and then find the \(dy\,dx\) integral and evaluate the simpler one.
I sketched the region which was easy enough and then found the easier of the two orders which was the \(dx\,dy\) integral and I got
$$\int_{0}^{2}\int_{y}^{\frac{y+2}{2}}xy\,dx\,dy$$
This evaluates to \(\frac{1}{6}\).
However I tried for the \(dy\,dx\) integral
$$\int_{0}^{2}\int_{2x-2}^{x}xy\,dy\,dx$$
and got the answer \(\frac{-38}{8}\) which definitely doesn't make sense. Where am I going wrong?
On the basis of geometrical evidence the integral has to be splitted into two integrals... $\displaystyle \int \int_{D} x\ y\ dA = \int_{0}^{1} \int_{0}^{x} x\ y\ d y\ d x + \int_{1}^{2} \int_{0}^{2x-2} x\ y\ d y\ d x$ (1)... and the integration is left to You...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Chisigma, are you positive that this is the right way to do it? Because the problem states:
a) Set up the integral for \(\int_{ }^{ }\int_{D}^{ }xy\,dA\) as a \(dydx\) integral
b) Set up the integral for \(\int_{ }^{ }\int_{D}^{ }xy\,dA\) as a \(dxdy\) integral
c) Solve the simpler of the two integrals
So is the wording of this problem just meant to be tricky, since its actually going to be two integrals for each order of \(\int_{ }^{ }\int_{D}^{ }xy\,dA\)?
 
Oh and @Prove It, turns out I did indeed mess up both of those integrals (Doh) however I am positive I got the right answers now and they are still different from each other. I got \(\frac{5}{6}\) for the \(dx\,dy\) integral and \(\frac{2}{3}\) for the \(dy\,dx\) integral.
 
Actually Chisigma, your graph is wrong, you didn't plot \(y=2x-2\) correctly, and that's where the error comes up. I used your technique with the correct region of integration and got the integrals
$$\int_{0}^{1}\int_{0}^{x}xy\,dy\,dx\,+\int_{1}^{2}\int_{2x-2}^{x}xy\,dy\,dx$$
and ended with the answer \(\frac{5}{6}\) which is the same as what I got from the other order integral
$$\int_{0}^{2}\int_{y}^{\frac{y+2}{y}}xy\,dx\,dy$$
That problem just claimed about 4 hours of my life (Whew)
 
Observing with care I have noticed that the region is bounded by $\displaystyle y = x,\ y = 2 x - 2,\ y=0$ and not by $\displaystyle y = x,\ y = 2 - 2 x,\ y=0$ so that my previous answer is not correct...

... very sorry! (Crying)...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
skatenerd said:
Actually Chisigma, your graph is wrong, you didn't plot \(y=2x-2\) correctly, and that's where the error comes up. I used your technique with the correct region of integration and got the integrals
$$\int_{0}^{1}\int_{0}^{x}xy\,dy\,dx\,+\int_{1}^{2}\int_{2x-2}^{x}xy\,dy\,dx$$
and ended with the answer \(\frac{5}{6}\) which is the same as what I got from the other order integral
$$\int_{0}^{2}\int_{y}^{\frac{y+2}{y}}xy\,dx\,dy$$
That problem just claimed about 4 hours of my life (Whew)

Please actually show us your attempt at the integration. There's probably just some very small mistake in amongst it which is giving you the wrong answer...
 
Prove It, my meaning in the last message was that I finally got matching results from the two separate ordered integral set ups. The answer is \(\frac{5}{6}\).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K