Double Slit detectors question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the double slit experiment, particularly focusing on the role of detectors and the concept of "observation" in quantum mechanics. Participants explore the implications of measurement on particle behavior, wave-particle duality, and the interpretation of quantum phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether detectors used in the double slit experiment might interfere with the results, suggesting that this interference could lead to the appearance of particles behaving like particles.
  • Others mention quantum decoherence as a relevant concept, indicating that it may help explain the transition from quantum behavior to classical measurement outcomes.
  • A participant argues that the notion of wave-particle duality is outdated and emphasizes that quantum objects do not conform to classical definitions of particles or waves, instead behaving as excitations of quantum fields.
  • There is a discussion about the role of polarizers in the double slit experiment, with one participant explaining how their orientation can affect interference patterns without the need for detectors.
  • Some participants express confusion over the term "observation," noting that it can refer to both detection and the experimental setup, which influences what can be measured.
  • The quantum eraser experiments are mentioned as evidence that the observed behavior is related to information rather than interference.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the implications of detectors in the double slit experiment or the nature of observation in quantum mechanics. Multiple competing views remain, particularly regarding the interpretation of quantum behavior and the role of information versus interference.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of defining "observation" and the assumptions underlying quantum mechanics. There are references to specific experimental setups and theoretical concepts, but no definitive conclusions are drawn.

  • #31
Johan0001 said:
When does this correlation between Bob and Alice's data manifest itself.
1. After Alice's recordings but before Bob's recordings.
2. After Alice's recordings and after Bob's Recordings
3. After Alice and Bobs recordings have been compared.

And further if the answer is 3 above, does it imply that the correlation could not exist ,between the time interval of event 2 and event 3?
Or even between event 1 and event 2 for that matter?

Orthodox QM is relatively silent on the specifics of when such correlations (and entanglement itself) begin and end. Different interpretations can yield different answers, and there is no specific test available to clarify. All you can do is predict the ultimate outcomes, and the rest is up to you. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
627
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K