Double Slit Experiment Mathematics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the mathematical analysis of the Double Slit Experiment, specifically the manipulation of the wave function for electrons passing through two slits. Participants explore the Taylor series expansion of the term ##z_0\sqrt{1 + (x-s/2)^2/z_0^2}##, with confusion arising over the simplification to ##z_0 + (x-s/2)^2/2 z_0##. The discussion also touches on Euler's identity and its application in deriving the final wave equation ##exp(i \theta) cos(ksx/2z_0)##, where ##k## is the wave number defined as ##\lambda = 2 \pi/k##. Key insights include the use of the binomial theorem and Taylor series for approximations in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave-particle duality.
  • Familiarity with Taylor series and binomial theorem applications.
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and Euler's formula.
  • Basic grasp of wave functions and their mathematical representations in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Taylor series in quantum mechanics, focusing on wave functions.
  • Learn about the binomial theorem and its fractional applications for complex functions.
  • Explore Euler's identity and its relevance in wave mechanics and quantum physics.
  • Investigate the derivation of wave equations in quantum mechanics, particularly in the context of the Double Slit Experiment.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, mathematicians interested in applied mathematics, and educators seeking to clarify complex wave function concepts.

James Brady
Messages
106
Reaction score
4
Electrons are shot thru two slits separated by a distance s at a screen a distance ##z_0## away. The wave function for the particles is proportional to ## e^{ik \sqrt{(x-s/2)^2+z_0^2}} +e^{ik \sqrt{(x+s/2)^2+z_0^2}}##

Taking the first one, we can manipulate the square root algebraically ##z_0\sqrt{1 + (x-s/2)^2/z_0^2}##, this is where I run into issues, according to the text we can use the fact that ##\sqrt{1+a} = 1 + a/2## in a power series expansion to get ##z_0 + (x-s/2)^2/2 z_0## for small values of x.

I don't know how they got that. When I do a Taylor series expansion on ##z_0\sqrt{1 + (x-s/2)^2/z_0^2}## I get ##z_0\sqrt{1 + (s/2)^2/z_0^2} - \frac{-s/2}{z_0*\sqrt{\frac{-2/2}{z_0^2}+1}} *x## ...

How did they come up with such a simple answer using ##\sum_{n=0}^1 \frac{f^n(0)}{n!} x^n## ?

Am I using the Taylor series wrong?

The book goes on to use ##2cos(\theta) = exp(i \theta) + exp(-i \theta)## to obtain a final wave equation (at the screen) of ##exp(i \theta) cos(ksx/2z_0)## where k is the wave number ##\lambda = 2 \pi/k##

How did they come up with that? I don't see the algebra at all.

confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
James Brady said:
Taking the first one, we can manipulate the square root algebraically ##z_0\sqrt{1 + (x-s/2)^2/z_0^2}##, this is where I run into issues, according to the text we can use the fact that ##\sqrt{1+a} = 1 + a/2##
That can be obtained from the binomial theorem, which is a special case of Taylor series.
James Brady said:
The book goes on to use ##2cos(\theta) = exp(i \theta) + exp(-i \theta)## to obtain a final wave equation (at the screen) of ##exp(i \theta) cos(ksx/2z_0)## where k is the wave number ##\lambda = 2 \pi/k##

How did they come up with that? I don't see the algebra at all.
Do you know Eulers identity for the complex exponential?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and James Brady
When I apply the Taylor series about x = 0:

##\frac{f(0)}{0!}0^0:####z_0 \sqrt{1 + (0-s/2)^2/z_0^2} = z_0 \sqrt{1 + (-s/2)^2/z_0^2}##
##\frac{f^{(1)}(0)}{1!}0^1:##
##\frac{0-s/2}{z_0 \sqrt{1 + (0-s/2)^2/z_0^2}}## = ##\frac{-s/2}{z_0 \sqrt{1 + (-s/2)^2/z_0^2}}##
Adding these values gives a different answer than the book.

I'm not exactly sure what a fractional binomial theorem looks look, I understand the whole number BT, but for square roots and what not I can't find a formula online.

...

I know Euler's identity ##exp(i \pi) + 1 = 0## I just don't see how that applies here.
 
You need to use the Taylor series around ##x = \frac s 2##.

You can make the calculation easier by the substitution ##a = \frac{(x -\frac s 2)^2}{z^2}##, as the book indicates. Then use the Taylor series about ##a = 0##.

Try Eulers formula!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
927
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
961
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K