Double Slit Experiment With Detectors

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of using detectors in the double slit experiment and how this affects the quantum state of particles. Participants explore concepts related to wave function collapse, interference patterns, and the quantum eraser experiment.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the presence of detectors leads to a mixed state or if the quantum system remains coherent, referencing the quantum eraser experiment.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on what is meant by "collapsed at the screen," indicating a need for precision in terminology.
  • A participant suggests that the determination of whether a particle went through one slit or both is not possible on an individual basis based solely on the screen's pattern.
  • It is noted that over time, the overall pattern may show either interference or no interference, depending on the detection method used.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of detection in the double slit experiment, with no consensus reached on whether the system collapses or remains coherent.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of interpreting results from the double slit experiment, particularly regarding the definitions of wave function collapse and the conditions under which interference patterns emerge.

StevieTNZ
Messages
1,944
Reaction score
837
Hi there,

I've been told even with detectors behind two slits detecting if a particle comes through, that doesn't exactly mean that the quantum system is now in a mixed-state (for example, the quantum eraser experiment of Scully).

How would we be able to differentiate between whether the system has collapsed or not at the screen? Even though it looks like a scatter pattern, wouldn't it really be made up of a fringe + anti-fringe interference pattern? Would we need to do some form of erasure on the detectors to determine whether the particle had gone through one slit or not? Say for example, half the time we go to detector 1 and reset it, then to detector 2 and reset it. And the other half, detector 2 and reset it, then detector 1 and reset it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "collapsed at the screen"?
 
Whether it had gone through one slit or both.
 
Over time the pattern of events will show either interference or no interference. We cannot tell on an individual particle basis whether it was detected in one slit or not, at least not in this method. (By only looking at the screen that is. If you look at the detectors at the slits it will be obvious)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K