Double Slit Experiment With Detectors

In summary, the conversation discussed the concept of a quantum system being in a mixed-state, specifically in relation to the quantum eraser experiment of Scully. The question was raised on how one can determine if the system has collapsed or not at the screen, and whether the scatter pattern observed is actually a combination of a fringe and anti-fringe interference pattern. It was suggested that erasing the information from the detectors may provide a way to differentiate between the particle going through one slit or both. The concept of "collapsed at the screen" was clarified, and it was noted that the interference pattern can only be observed over time, not on an individual particle basis.
  • #1
StevieTNZ
1,933
878
Hi there,

I've been told even with detectors behind two slits detecting if a particle comes through, that doesn't exactly mean that the quantum system is now in a mixed-state (for example, the quantum eraser experiment of Scully).

How would we be able to differentiate between whether the system has collapsed or not at the screen? Even though it looks like a scatter pattern, wouldn't it really be made up of a fringe + anti-fringe interference pattern? Would we need to do some form of erasure on the detectors to determine whether the particle had gone through one slit or not? Say for example, half the time we go to detector 1 and reset it, then to detector 2 and reset it. And the other half, detector 2 and reset it, then detector 1 and reset it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What do you mean by "collapsed at the screen"?
 
  • #3
Whether it had gone through one slit or both.
 
  • #4
Over time the pattern of events will show either interference or no interference. We cannot tell on an individual particle basis whether it was detected in one slit or not, at least not in this method. (By only looking at the screen that is. If you look at the detectors at the slits it will be obvious)
 

1. What is the double slit experiment with detectors?

The double slit experiment with detectors is a classic experiment in physics that demonstrates the wave-particle duality of light. It involves shining a beam of light through two parallel slits and observing the interference pattern that is produced on a screen behind the slits.

2. How does the double slit experiment with detectors work?

In the experiment, a light source is used to illuminate two parallel slits. The light passing through the slits creates an interference pattern on a screen behind the slits. When detectors are placed at the slits to determine which slit the light passes through, the interference pattern disappears and the light behaves like particles instead of waves.

3. What is the significance of the double slit experiment with detectors?

The double slit experiment with detectors has significant implications for our understanding of the nature of light and matter. It shows that light can behave both as a wave and as a particle, which goes against our classical understanding of physics.

4. How does the double slit experiment with detectors relate to the observer effect?

The double slit experiment with detectors is often used to illustrate the observer effect, which states that the act of observing something can influence its behavior. In this experiment, the presence of detectors at the slits changes the behavior of the light, demonstrating the impact of observation on the outcome of an experiment.

5. What are some real-world applications of the double slit experiment with detectors?

The double slit experiment with detectors has many real-world applications, particularly in the field of quantum mechanics. It has been used to study the behavior of electrons, which also exhibit wave-particle duality. It has also been used in the development of technologies such as electron microscopes and quantum computers.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
257
Replies
5
Views
773
Replies
28
Views
534
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
49
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
774
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
14
Views
1K
Back
Top