Double Slit Experiment with White Light and one Slit colour filtered

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of conducting the double slit experiment using white light with one slit covered by a monochromatic filter. Two scenarios are proposed: in the first, an interference pattern emerges for the filtered color while the unfiltered slit displays a particle pattern representing the remaining wavelengths of white light. In the second scenario, no interference pattern occurs, and the output from the unfiltered slit remains white while the filtered slit produces monochromatic light. The consensus is that interference occurs only if the wavelength of the monochromatic light matches that of the filter.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the double slit experiment
  • Knowledge of wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with monochromatic light and its properties
  • Basic concepts of light wavelengths and interference patterns
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the effects of monochromatic filters on light behavior
  • Study interference patterns in detail, particularly in relation to wavelength
  • Investigate the implications of photon polarization in experiments
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in quantum mechanics and optical experiments will benefit from this discussion.

Commando Spaz
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
What would happen if the double slit experiment were to be undertaken using white light, and one of the slits was covered by a monochromatic filter (i.e. something which only one wavelength could pass through), and apart from this there was no detector monitoring which slit each photon was coming through?
I think there are two possible scenarios:

1. The wave interference pattern is visible for the colour of the filter, however the rest of the light would display a normal particle pattern behind the slit which was not filtered, it would not be white light, but would represent the white light if the wavelength of the monochromatic filtered light were removed from it.

2. There would be no interference pattern and the particle pattern would appear on the screen, the light which came through the non filtered slit would be white, and the light which came through the filtered slit would be monochromatic.

Please explain which, if either of these scenarios would occur, please explain why or why not
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Commando Spaz said:
2. There would be no interference pattern and the particle pattern would appear on the screen, the light which came through the non filtered slit would be white, and the light which came through the filtered slit would be monochromatic.

What do you mean by this? The light coming through the slits will retain their property since there is no interference near the slits.
 
Before going any further can you explain what you think each photon of white light is. In particular do you think each are the same?

Thanks
Bill
 
bhobba said:
Before going any further can you explain what you think each photon of white light is. In particular do you think each are the same?

Thanks
Bill

I understand that white light is made up of photons of different wavelengths
 
Last edited:
Adithyan said:
What do you mean by this? The light coming through the slits will retain their property since there is no interference near the slits.

Yes, that's what I mean in the second scenario. In the first scenario, the monochromatic light passing through the filtered slit interacts with the same wavelength going through the unfiltered slit. The other wavelengths of the white light are unaffected.
 
Commando Spaz said:
I understand that white light is made up of photons of different wavelengths

That's correct - and random polarisations as well.

That being the case the solution to your query is easy.

If its the same wavelength as the colour filter of your slit you will get interference. If not it will not pass through that slit and you wont.

It looks pretty trivial to me, which is why I asked the question.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
502
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K