Double Slit - Post Incident Detection

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the double slit experiment and its implications for particle detection. The user outlines the experiment's results, noting that one slit yields a single probability distribution, two slits create an interference pattern, and adding a detector collapses the wave function into two distinct bands. The user inquires about conducting an experiment using thermally sensitive materials in a cold box to detect temperature gradients from hot particles, but it is concluded that such an experiment is not feasible due to the nature of temperature as a property of large aggregates of particles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically wave-particle duality.
  • Familiarity with the double slit experiment and its outcomes.
  • Knowledge of thermodynamics and the definition of temperature.
  • Experience with experimental physics methodologies and setups.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of wave function collapse in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore advanced topics in thermodynamics related to particle behavior.
  • Investigate experimental designs for quantum detection methods.
  • Learn about the principles of interference patterns in quantum experiments.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and researchers interested in experimental physics and the nuances of particle detection methods.

simplyred
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey All,

I'm probably going to get railed for not searching hard enough for an answer to my idiotic question, but here goes anyways...

The double slit experiment results go like this [correct me if I'm wrong here]
1/ One slit open --> One band\probability dist.
2/ Two slits open --> Interference Pattern
3/ Two slits open with detector at slit --> 2 individual non-interfering bands\probability dist., essentially we've collapsed the wave function and forced the particle properties by "looking".

I hope I've understood that at least - yes?

So my question is - has anyone set up an experiment in a cold box with a thermally sensitive material for the slits and then shot hot particles one-by-one, then measured any temperature gradients across the slits after registering on the other side of the wall?

Would this be considered post-entrance detection? Will the heat signature will still be there? Is this even possible?

I'm guessing - there won't be any and we'll just get result #2? Just checking to see if this has been done or is not even required...

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Such an experiment has not been done. The problem is that temperature is a property of large aggregates of particles (look at its thermodynamic definition to confirm) so cannot be meaningfully applied to individual isolated particles. Thus, there's no such thing as "hot particles, one-by-one".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K