Doubts on Exercise Wording: Energy Density & Poynting Vector

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on clarifying the calculation of mean energy density and the Poynting vector in an exercise. It questions whether the average energy density should incorporate a factor of cos²(ωt) due to the B² term, suggesting that the mean energy density could be expressed as <u>=1/2 ε₀ (cB)². Additionally, there is a consideration of whether to compute the mean amplitude of the Poynting vector, <S>=B²c/μ₀, despite the exercise not explicitly stating this. The consensus leans towards using the RMS magnetic field for calculations, as the wave shape of the radiation is uncertain. Overall, the average energy density can be derived directly from the RMS value without further averaging.
lorenz0
Messages
151
Reaction score
28
Homework Statement
In a certain place on Earth, the magnitude of the magnetic field of solar radiation is equal to ##B##.
Calculate the average energy density of solar radiation in that area and the amplitude of the Poynting vector.
Relevant Equations
##u=\varepsilon_0 (cB)^2##, ##S=\frac{B^2 c}{\mu_0}##
I have doubts about the wording of the exercise:

(1) energy density is ##u=\varepsilon_0 (cB)^2## but since the question asks for mean energy density should I perhaps average over ##cos^2 (\omega t)## (there due to the ##B^2##) and thus use ##<u>=\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon_0 (cB)^2##?

(2) it seems to me that usually, due to the rapid changing of the electric and magnetic fields, one is interested in the mean of the amplitude of the Poynting vector ##<S>=\frac{B^2 c}{\mu_0}##, so perhaps that is the one I should compute (even if the text doesn't say so)?

I would be grateful for your feedback.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I presume the magnetic field quoted is the RMS field. This is the only meaningful term to use because the wave shape of the radiation is not known, being noise-like.
Therefore I think the average energy density may be calculated direct from that value without further averaging.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top