Doubts on Exercise Wording: Energy Density & Poynting Vector

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on clarifying the calculation of mean energy density and the Poynting vector in an exercise. It questions whether the average energy density should incorporate a factor of cos²(ωt) due to the B² term, suggesting that the mean energy density could be expressed as <u>=1/2 ε₀ (cB)². Additionally, there is a consideration of whether to compute the mean amplitude of the Poynting vector, <S>=B²c/μ₀, despite the exercise not explicitly stating this. The consensus leans towards using the RMS magnetic field for calculations, as the wave shape of the radiation is uncertain. Overall, the average energy density can be derived directly from the RMS value without further averaging.
lorenz0
Messages
151
Reaction score
28
Homework Statement
In a certain place on Earth, the magnitude of the magnetic field of solar radiation is equal to ##B##.
Calculate the average energy density of solar radiation in that area and the amplitude of the Poynting vector.
Relevant Equations
##u=\varepsilon_0 (cB)^2##, ##S=\frac{B^2 c}{\mu_0}##
I have doubts about the wording of the exercise:

(1) energy density is ##u=\varepsilon_0 (cB)^2## but since the question asks for mean energy density should I perhaps average over ##cos^2 (\omega t)## (there due to the ##B^2##) and thus use ##<u>=\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon_0 (cB)^2##?

(2) it seems to me that usually, due to the rapid changing of the electric and magnetic fields, one is interested in the mean of the amplitude of the Poynting vector ##<S>=\frac{B^2 c}{\mu_0}##, so perhaps that is the one I should compute (even if the text doesn't say so)?

I would be grateful for your feedback.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I presume the magnetic field quoted is the RMS field. This is the only meaningful term to use because the wave shape of the radiation is not known, being noise-like.
Therefore I think the average energy density may be calculated direct from that value without further averaging.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top