MHB Draw Sketch: Right Triangle Area = Half Parallelogram Area (Party)

mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
View attachment 6172

Any thoughts on the sketch? (Party)

Many Thanks :)
 

Attachments

  • New Document 59-Page 1.jpg
    New Document 59-Page 1.jpg
    25 KB · Views: 137
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I presume that the "right triangle" referred to is the one at the right of the parallelogram. It should be clear to you that the right triangle at the left is identical to the first one and has the same area. So in order that the area of either of those two right triangles be "exactly half" the area of the parallelogram, there must be nothing but those two right triangles. That is, there is no "middle section"- the "two" verticals must be one- that vertical goes from vertex D to vertex B. What does that look like?
 
HallsofIvy said:
I presume that the "right triangle" referred to is the one at the right of the parallelogram. It should be clear to you that the right triangle at the left is identical to the first one and has the same area. So in order that the area of either of those two right triangles be "exactly half" the area of the parallelogram, there must be nothing but those two right triangles. That is, there is no "middle section"- the "two" verticals must be one- that vertical goes from vertex D to vertex B. What does that look like?

(Wave) Hello HallsofIvy,

This should be that identical right angled triangle at the left

View attachment 6176

Then the triangle which has half the area of the parallelogram would be,

View attachment 6177

Correct ? (Happy)

Many THanks (Party)
 

Attachments

  • New Document 59-Page 1.jpg
    New Document 59-Page 1.jpg
    13.1 KB · Views: 117
  • New Document 59-Page 1.jpg
    New Document 59-Page 1.jpg
    13.4 KB · Views: 120
mathlearn said:
This should be that identical right angled triangle at the left

Then the triangle which has half the area of the parallelogram would be,

Correct ? (Happy)

Hey mathlearn! (Smile)

I think the right triangle is fixed.
We have something like this:
\begin{tikzpicture}[shorten >=1pt, shorten <=1pt, font=\large]
%preamble \usetikzlibrary{arrows}

\def\x{6};

\draw[ultra thick, blue]
(0,0) coordinate (A)
-- ({2*\x - 4},0) coordinate (B)
-- ({2*\x - 4 + \x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (C)
-- ({\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (D)
-- cycle;

\node
at (A) {A};
\node
at (B) {B};
\node
at (C) {C};
\node
at (D) {D};

\draw[dashed] ({2*\x - 4},0) -- ({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (E);
\node[above,yshift=3mm] at (E) {E};

\draw ({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) rectangle ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});

\draw ({2*\x - 4 - 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 + 0.05}) -- ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 + 0.05});
\draw ({2*\x - 4 - 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 - 0.05}) -- ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 - 0.05});
\draw ({\x*5/2 - 6 - 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.2}) -- ({\x*5/2 - 6 - 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});
\draw ({\x*5/2 - 6 + 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.2}) -- ({\x*5/2 - 6 + 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});

\draw[triangle 45-triangle 45] ({\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25}) -- node[above] {$x$} (({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25});
\draw[triangle 45-triangle 45] (({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25}) -- node[above] {$x-4$} ({2*\x - 4 + \x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25});

\end{tikzpicture}

And if we make $x$ smaller, we get:
\begin{tikzpicture}[shorten >=1pt, shorten <=1pt, font=\large]
%preamble \usetikzlibrary{arrows}

\def\x{5};

\draw[ultra thick, blue]
(0,0) coordinate (A)
-- ({2*\x - 4},0) coordinate (B)
-- ({2*\x - 4 + \x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (C)
-- ({\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (D)
-- cycle;

\node
at (A) {A};
\node
at (B) {B};
\node
at (C) {C};
\node
at (D) {D};

\draw[dashed] ({2*\x - 4},0) -- ({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (E);
\node[above,yshift=6mm] at (E) {E};

\draw ({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) rectangle ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});

\draw ({2*\x - 4 - 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 + 0.05}) -- ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 + 0.05});
\draw ({2*\x - 4 - 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 - 0.05}) -- ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 - 0.05});
\draw ({\x*5/2 - 6 - 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.2}) -- ({\x*5/2 - 6 - 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});
\draw ({\x*5/2 - 6 + 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.2}) -- ({\x*5/2 - 6 + 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});

\draw[triangle 45-triangle 45] ({\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25}) -- node[above] {$x$} (({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25});
\draw[triangle 45-triangle 45] (({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25}) -- node[above] {$x-4$} ({2*\x - 4 + \x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25});

\end{tikzpicture}

Hmm... let's make $x$ negative:
\begin{tikzpicture}[shorten >=1pt, shorten <=1pt, font=\large]
%preamble \usetikzlibrary{arrows}

\def\x{-2};

\draw[ultra thick, red]
(0,0) coordinate (A)
-- ({2*\x - 4},0) coordinate (B)
-- ({2*\x - 4 + \x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (C)
-- ({\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (D)
-- cycle;

\node
at (A) {A};
\node
at (B) {B};
\node
at (C) {C};
\node
at (D) {D};

\draw[dashed] ({2*\x - 4},0) -- ({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (E);
\node[above,yshift=6mm] at (E) {E};

\draw ({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) rectangle ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});

\draw ({2*\x - 4 - 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 + 0.05}) -- ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 + 0.05});
\draw ({2*\x - 4 - 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 - 0.05}) -- ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 - 0.05});
\draw ({\x*5/2 - 6 - 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.2}) -- ({\x*5/2 - 6 - 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});
\draw ({\x*5/2 - 6 + 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.2}) -- ({\x*5/2 - 6 + 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});

\draw[triangle 45-triangle 45] ({\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25}) -- node[above] {$x$} (({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25});
\draw[triangle 45-triangle 45] (({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25}) -- node[above] {$x-4$} ({2*\x - 4 + \x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25});

\end{tikzpicture}

I think we need $x=0$:
\begin{tikzpicture}[shorten >=1pt, shorten <=1pt, font=\large]
%preamble \usetikzlibrary{arrows}

\def\x{0};

\draw[ultra thick, red]
(0,0) coordinate (A)
-- ({2*\x - 4},0) coordinate (B)
-- ({2*\x - 4 + \x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (C)
-- ({\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (D)
-- cycle;

\node
at (A) {A};
\node
at (B) {B};
\node
at (C) {C};
\node
at (D) {D};

\draw[dashed] ({2*\x - 4},0) -- ({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (E);
\node[above,yshift=6mm] at (E) {E};

\draw ({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) rectangle ({2*\x - 4 - 0.2},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});

\draw ({2*\x - 4 - 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 + 0.05}) -- ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 + 0.05});
\draw ({2*\x - 4 - 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 - 0.05}) -- ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 - 0.05});
\draw ({\x*5/2 - 6 - 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.2}) -- ({\x*5/2 - 6 - 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});
\draw ({\x*5/2 - 6 + 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.2}) -- ({\x*5/2 - 6 + 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});

\draw[triangle 45-triangle 45] ({\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25}) -- node[above,xshift=3mm] {$x$} (({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25});
\draw[triangle 45-triangle 45] (({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25}) -- node[above] {$x-4$} ({2*\x - 4 + \x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25});

\end{tikzpicture}

Now the right triangle takes up half of the parallellogram. (Happy)​
 
Last edited:
mathlearn said:
(Wave) Hello HallsofIvy,

This should be that identical right angled triangle at the left
Then the triangle which has half the area of the parallelogram would be,
Correct ? (Happy)

Many THanks (Party)
No, those are not right triangles. And it is always true that the two triangles you get by drawing a diagonal have area half the parallelogram.

- -

- - - Updated - - -

I like Serena said:
Hey mathlearn! (Smile)

I think the right triangle is fixed.
We have something like this:
\begin{tikzpicture}[shorten >=1pt, shorten <=1pt, font=\large]

\def\x{6};

\draw[ultra thick, blue]
(0,0) coordinate (A)
-- ({2*\x - 4},0) coordinate (B)
-- ({2*\x - 4 + \x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (C)
-- ({\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (D)
-- cycle;

\node
at (A) {A};
\node
at (B) {B};
\node
at (C) {C};
\node
at (D) {D};

\draw[dashed] ({2*\x - 4},0) -- ({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (E);
\node[above,yshift=3mm] at (E) {E};

\draw ({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) rectangle ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});

\draw ({2*\x - 4 - 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 + 0.05}) -- ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 + 0.05});
\draw ({2*\x - 4 - 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 - 0.05}) -- ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 - 0.05});
\draw ({\x*5/2 - 6 - 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.2}) -- ({\x*5/2 - 6 - 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});
\draw ({\x*5/2 - 6 + 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.2}) -- ({\x*5/2 - 6 + 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});

\draw[triangle 45-triangle 45] ({\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25}) -- node[above] {$x$} (({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25});
\draw[triangle 45-triangle 45] (({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25}) -- node[above] {$x-4$} ({2*\x - 4 + \x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25});

\end{tikzpicture}

And if we make $x$ smaller, we get:
\begin{tikzpicture}[shorten >=1pt, shorten <=1pt, font=\large]

\def\x{5};

\draw[ultra thick, blue]
(0,0) coordinate (A)
-- ({2*\x - 4},0) coordinate (B)
-- ({2*\x - 4 + \x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (C)
-- ({\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (D)
-- cycle;

\node
at (A) {A};
\node
at (B) {B};
\node
at (C) {C};
\node
at (D) {D};

\draw[dashed] ({2*\x - 4},0) -- ({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (E);
\node[above,yshift=6mm] at (E) {E};

\draw ({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) rectangle ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});

\draw ({2*\x - 4 - 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 + 0.05}) -- ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 + 0.05});
\draw ({2*\x - 4 - 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 - 0.05}) -- ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 - 0.05});
\draw ({\x*5/2 - 6 - 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.2}) -- ({\x*5/2 - 6 - 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});
\draw ({\x*5/2 - 6 + 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.2}) -- ({\x*5/2 - 6 + 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});

\draw[triangle 45-triangle 45] ({\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25}) -- node[above] {$x$} (({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25});
\draw[triangle 45-triangle 45] (({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25}) -- node[above] {$x-4$} ({2*\x - 4 + \x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25});

\end{tikzpicture}

Hmm... let's make $x$ negative:
\begin{tikzpicture}[shorten >=1pt, shorten <=1pt, font=\large]

\def\x{-2};

\draw[ultra thick, red]
(0,0) coordinate (A)
-- ({2*\x - 4},0) coordinate (B)
-- ({2*\x - 4 + \x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (C)
-- ({\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (D)
-- cycle;

\node
at (A) {A};
\node
at (B) {B};
\node
at (C) {C};
\node
at (D) {D};

\draw[dashed] ({2*\x - 4},0) -- ({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (E);
\node[above,yshift=6mm] at (E) {E};

\draw ({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) rectangle ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});

\draw ({2*\x - 4 - 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 + 0.05}) -- ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 + 0.05});
\draw ({2*\x - 4 - 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 - 0.05}) -- ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 - 0.05});
\draw ({\x*5/2 - 6 - 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.2}) -- ({\x*5/2 - 6 - 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});
\draw ({\x*5/2 - 6 + 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.2}) -- ({\x*5/2 - 6 + 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});

\draw[triangle 45-triangle 45] ({\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25}) -- node[above] {$x$} (({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25});
\draw[triangle 45-triangle 45] (({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25}) -- node[above] {$x-4$} ({2*\x - 4 + \x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25});

\end{tikzpicture}

I think we need $x=0$:
\begin{tikzpicture}[shorten >=1pt, shorten <=1pt, font=\large]

\def\x{0};

\draw[ultra thick, red]
(0,0) coordinate (A)
-- ({2*\x - 4},0) coordinate (B)
-- ({2*\x - 4 + \x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (C)
-- ({\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (D)
-- cycle;

\node
at (A) {A};
\node
at (B) {B};
\node
at (C) {C};
\node
at (D) {D};

\draw[dashed] ({2*\x - 4},0) -- ({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) coordinate (E);
\node[above,yshift=6mm] at (E) {E};

\draw ({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4)}) rectangle ({2*\x - 4 - 0.2},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});

\draw ({2*\x - 4 - 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 + 0.05}) -- ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 + 0.05});
\draw ({2*\x - 4 - 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 - 0.05}) -- ({2*\x - 4 + 0.2},{abs(\x - 4)/2 - 0.05});
\draw ({\x*5/2 - 6 - 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.2}) -- ({\x*5/2 - 6 - 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});
\draw ({\x*5/2 - 6 + 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.2}) -- ({\x*5/2 - 6 + 0.05},{abs(\x - 4) - 0.2});

\draw[triangle 45-triangle 45] ({\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25}) -- node[above,xshift=3mm] {$x$} (({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25});
\draw[triangle 45-triangle 45] (({2*\x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25}) -- node[above] {$x-4$} ({2*\x - 4 + \x - 4},{abs(\x - 4) + 0.25});

\end{tikzpicture}

Now the right triangle takes up half of the parallellogram. (Happy)​

Yes, that was what I meant. Nice drawings!​
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top