Dryness fraction of saturated steam

Click For Summary
When saturated steam is expanded isentropically across a turbine, the expected decrease in dryness fraction can sometimes lead to unexpected results, as seen in this discussion. The problem involves a saturated steam mixture at 330°C with a vapor fraction of 0.5, expanded to 150°C, where calculations showed an increase in dryness fraction instead. The calculations for enthalpy and entropy were performed using standard formulas, but the results raised questions about the assumptions made, particularly regarding isentropic efficiency. It was noted that a low initial vapor fraction could affect the outcome, suggesting that the exercise might not accurately reflect real-world conditions. The discussion highlights the complexities involved in thermodynamic calculations related to steam expansion.
maserati1969
Messages
24
Reaction score
3
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
Hi all, any thoughts on the following problem please?

When saturated steam is expanded isentropically across a turbine, the dryness fraction should decrease. However, when I calculated the answer to the following question, it actually increased slightly. Any ideas where I went wrong?

Question:
Saturated steam mixture at temperature 330°C with vapour mixture fraction of 0.5 is flowing through a turbine at a flow rate of 6 kg/s. Steam is expanded isentropically to temperature 150°C at the turbine exit. Assume that the turbine external walls are fully insulated (adiabatic turbine). Calculate enthalpy at exit.

My solution:
Using enthalpy formula at inlet (3300C) and data from table: h1 = hf +x.hfg
h1 = 2095.95 kJ/kg
Is isentropic so s1 = s2 So entropy at inlet: s1 = sf +x.sfg
s1 = 4.4969 kJ/kg.K also = s2
Therefore at 150 degrees C: entropy: 4.4969 = 1.8418 + (x.4.9953)
Therefore x = 0.53151 (This should decrease, not increase)
Now use new ‘x’ value for h2:
h2 = 632.18 + (0.53151.2113.8)
h2 = 1755.7 kJ/kg

Many thanks in advance.
Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

I get the same result. Perhaps the exercise composer didn't worry about reality. 100% isentropic efficiency ?
And ##x_{in}=0.5## is low: for ##x_{in}>0.55## it doesn't increase any more.

##\ ##
 
Thank you BvU
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
721
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K