Dryness fraction of saturated steam

AI Thread Summary
When saturated steam is expanded isentropically across a turbine, the expected decrease in dryness fraction can sometimes lead to unexpected results, as seen in this discussion. The problem involves a saturated steam mixture at 330°C with a vapor fraction of 0.5, expanded to 150°C, where calculations showed an increase in dryness fraction instead. The calculations for enthalpy and entropy were performed using standard formulas, but the results raised questions about the assumptions made, particularly regarding isentropic efficiency. It was noted that a low initial vapor fraction could affect the outcome, suggesting that the exercise might not accurately reflect real-world conditions. The discussion highlights the complexities involved in thermodynamic calculations related to steam expansion.
maserati1969
Messages
24
Reaction score
3
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
Hi all, any thoughts on the following problem please?

When saturated steam is expanded isentropically across a turbine, the dryness fraction should decrease. However, when I calculated the answer to the following question, it actually increased slightly. Any ideas where I went wrong?

Question:
Saturated steam mixture at temperature 330°C with vapour mixture fraction of 0.5 is flowing through a turbine at a flow rate of 6 kg/s. Steam is expanded isentropically to temperature 150°C at the turbine exit. Assume that the turbine external walls are fully insulated (adiabatic turbine). Calculate enthalpy at exit.

My solution:
Using enthalpy formula at inlet (3300C) and data from table: h1 = hf +x.hfg
h1 = 2095.95 kJ/kg
Is isentropic so s1 = s2 So entropy at inlet: s1 = sf +x.sfg
s1 = 4.4969 kJ/kg.K also = s2
Therefore at 150 degrees C: entropy: 4.4969 = 1.8418 + (x.4.9953)
Therefore x = 0.53151 (This should decrease, not increase)
Now use new ‘x’ value for h2:
h2 = 632.18 + (0.53151.2113.8)
h2 = 1755.7 kJ/kg

Many thanks in advance.
Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

I get the same result. Perhaps the exercise composer didn't worry about reality. 100% isentropic efficiency ?
And ##x_{in}=0.5## is low: for ##x_{in}>0.55## it doesn't increase any more.

##\ ##
 
Thank you BvU
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top