Dryness fraction of saturated steam

AI Thread Summary
When saturated steam is expanded isentropically across a turbine, the expected decrease in dryness fraction can sometimes lead to unexpected results, as seen in this discussion. The problem involves a saturated steam mixture at 330°C with a vapor fraction of 0.5, expanded to 150°C, where calculations showed an increase in dryness fraction instead. The calculations for enthalpy and entropy were performed using standard formulas, but the results raised questions about the assumptions made, particularly regarding isentropic efficiency. It was noted that a low initial vapor fraction could affect the outcome, suggesting that the exercise might not accurately reflect real-world conditions. The discussion highlights the complexities involved in thermodynamic calculations related to steam expansion.
maserati1969
Messages
24
Reaction score
3
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
Hi all, any thoughts on the following problem please?

When saturated steam is expanded isentropically across a turbine, the dryness fraction should decrease. However, when I calculated the answer to the following question, it actually increased slightly. Any ideas where I went wrong?

Question:
Saturated steam mixture at temperature 330°C with vapour mixture fraction of 0.5 is flowing through a turbine at a flow rate of 6 kg/s. Steam is expanded isentropically to temperature 150°C at the turbine exit. Assume that the turbine external walls are fully insulated (adiabatic turbine). Calculate enthalpy at exit.

My solution:
Using enthalpy formula at inlet (3300C) and data from table: h1 = hf +x.hfg
h1 = 2095.95 kJ/kg
Is isentropic so s1 = s2 So entropy at inlet: s1 = sf +x.sfg
s1 = 4.4969 kJ/kg.K also = s2
Therefore at 150 degrees C: entropy: 4.4969 = 1.8418 + (x.4.9953)
Therefore x = 0.53151 (This should decrease, not increase)
Now use new ‘x’ value for h2:
h2 = 632.18 + (0.53151.2113.8)
h2 = 1755.7 kJ/kg

Many thanks in advance.
Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

I get the same result. Perhaps the exercise composer didn't worry about reality. 100% isentropic efficiency ?
And ##x_{in}=0.5## is low: for ##x_{in}>0.55## it doesn't increase any more.

##\ ##
 
Thank you BvU
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top