MHB D's Rational Approximations Question from YAnswers

  • Thread starter Thread starter CaptainBlack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rational
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around rational approximations related to the equation \(m^2 = 2n^2 + 1\). It establishes that there are no integer solutions for \(m^2 = 2n^2\) because irrational numbers cannot be expressed as fractions. The thread demonstrates that if \(m\) and \(n\) are solutions to the equation, then new solutions can be generated using \(M = m^2 + 2n^2\) and \(N = 2mn\), leading to infinitely many pairs of integers satisfying the equation. Additionally, it clarifies that if a prime \(p\) divides \(n\), it does not divide \(m\), ensuring \(m/n\) is in reduced form. The main focus is on generating a fraction that approximates \(\sqrt{2}\) to five decimal places, emphasizing the need for further assistance in this area.
CaptainBlack
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
Some bits are ok but I thought I would include them anyway as it is needed to answer the other parts of the question. I have labelled the parts which I need help with.

(a) Recall why there are no integer solutions \(m, n \in \mathbb{N}\) to the equation \(m^2 = 2n^2\).
ANSWER = an irrational number cannot be expressed as a fraction

(b) Show that if \(m, n \in \mathbb{N}\) are integer solutions to the equation
\(m^2 = 2n^2 + 1\), (*)
then so are \(M = m^2 + 2n^2\) and \(N = 2mn\), namely \(M^2 = 2N^2 + 1\).
ANSWER = sub them in and then they equal each other(c)Give a simple solution \(m, n \in \mathbb{N}\) to equation (*).
ANSWER = When \(m=3\) and \(n=2\)

(d )Deduce that there are infinitely many pairs of integers \(m, n \in \mathbb{N}\) satisfying (*).
ANSWER = Help? A hint is that \(M^2 = 2N^2 + 1\) is significantly larger than (*)

(e) Let \(m, n \in \mathbb{N}\) be any pair of integers satisfying equation (*).
Show that if \(p \in \mathbb{N}\) is a prime number then
\(p | n\) implies that \p doesn’t divide m.
[Use the fact that if \(p\) is prime and \(a, b \in \mathbb{N}\), and \(p | ab\) then \(p | a\) or \( p | b\)].
ANSWER = I done this so it’s ok but have included it anyway

( f ) What does it mean for a fraction \(a/b\) to be in reduced form? ANSWER = done
Explain why if \(m, n \in \mathbb{N}\) satisfy equation (*), then is \(m/n\) in reduced form. ANSWER = Help?

(g) Use the above to generate a fraction which approximates \(\sqrt{2}\) to 5 decimal places.
ANSWER = Help? This is the main bit in which I require help as you have to use the question to generate the approximation.
So mainly g, a bit of f and d is what I need help with thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
d) Suppose otherwise, then there are a finite number of solutions to (*). Let \(m,n\) be the solution with largest \(m\). Then \(M=m^2+2n^2,\ N=2mn\) by part (b) is also a solution of (*), but as \(m,n \in \mathbb{N}\) we have \(M>m\), a contradiction.

Hence it is not the case that there are a finite number of solutions ..

( e ) \(a/b\) is in reduced form if \(a\) and \(b\) have no common factor greater than \(1\) (that is are co-prime).

Suppose \(m\) and \(n\) have a common factor \(k>1\), then \(k|m^2\) and \(k|2n^2\) in which case \(k\) does not divide \(2n^2+1\) a contradiction. That is \(m\) and \(n\) have no common factor greater than \(1\) hence \(m/n\) is in reduced form.

(g) Consider \(m,n \in \mathbb{N}\) a solution to (*), then:

\(m^2/n^2 = 2 + 1/n^2\)

So if we have a sequence \((m_1,n_1), (m_2,n_2) ...\) of solutions to (*) with \(n_1, n_2, ..\) increasing then \((m_k)^2/(n_k)^2\) tends to \(2\) as \(k\) goes to infinity and \(m_k/n_k\) goes to \(\sqrt{2}\).

Now we have a recipe for generating such a sequence:

\(m_{k+1}=m_k^2 + 2n_k^2,\ n_{k+1}=2 m_k n_k\), with \(m_1=3,\ n_1=2\)

So we can now proceed to find an appropriate approximation (you may want to calculate how big \(n_k\) needs to be to give the required accuracy)

CB
 
CaptainBlack said:
...b) show that if \(m, n \in \mathbb{N}\) are integer solutions to the equation

$ m^{2} = 2\ n^{2} + 1$ (*)

... then so are \(M = m^2 + 2n^2\) and \(N = 2mn\), namely...

\(M^2 = 2N^2 + 1\) (**)...

In my opinion the most insidious task is to demonstrate b). That is my approach: if (*) is true then...

$m^{2}-2\ n^{2} -1 =0$ (1)

... so that is also...

$M^{2}-2\ N^{2} - 1 = m^{4} - 4\ m^{2}\ n^{2} + 4\ n^{4} -1 = (m^{2}-2\ n^{2} -1)\ (m^{2}-2\ n^{2} +1)=0$ (2)

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top