Dual Degree in Physics and Engineering, B.S.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision-making process regarding pursuing a dual degree in physics and engineering versus a single degree in physics or engineering physics. Participants explore the implications of each educational path on job prospects, graduate school opportunities, and financial considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about job prospects with a B.S. in physics and considers a dual degree to enhance employability.
  • Another suggests that a single degree in engineering physics might suffice for the participant's goals.
  • Some participants argue that while a dual degree may provide more job opportunities, it could also lead to a sacrifice in the depth of physics education needed for a Ph.D.
  • There is a discussion about the potential trade-offs between the number of physics and engineering courses in a dual degree program.
  • Concerns are raised about the financial implications of pursuing a Ph.D. after obtaining an engineering job, including the difficulty of transitioning back to academia.
  • One participant mentions the possibility of deferring undergraduate loans by going directly to graduate school, which could influence the decision to pursue a dual degree.
  • Another participant reflects on their personal experience and perspective regarding the attractiveness of engineering physics degrees compared to pure engineering degrees for industry jobs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the value of a dual degree versus a single degree, with no consensus reached on which path is definitively better. Concerns about job prospects, educational depth, and financial implications remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the dual-degree program may focus more on engineering than on preparing students for physics graduate schools, which could affect the depth of physics education received.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering dual degrees in physics and engineering, those exploring career paths in academia versus industry, and individuals interested in the financial implications of graduate education may find this discussion relevant.

MainCharacter
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Howdy,

I need help sorting out a plan... again. It has come to my attention, the various opinions on how hard it is for a bachelors in physics to get a job. Here's what i originally had in mind: B.S. physics -> get a job -> M.S. & Ph.D. physics. It is indeed a crude plan but to specify the job is needed to pay of loans and to build a sustainable savings until I can pursue further education. Now if i can't find a desired job the whole plan would surely fall apart.

So to build job insurance would you recommend that I take the dual degree path? With an engineering degree on me It seems it would open up more jobs and it may be easier to sell myself to the employer. On the other hand, if i could sell my self to the employer well in the first place i should be fine with just the physics degree. So, is it worth it? The program I'm thinking about is Loyola's Dual Degree program, its 5 years for the two B.S.'s.

Dual degree or just one degree? Your advice please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A single degree in engineering physics may help meet the goals you mentioned.
 
Thanks for your input good sir. I'm going to look into this engineering physics degree.
 
No direct experience with it, but from what I've read about engineering physics it may fall short of what you are expecting on the physics end, since you want a phd eventually.

I personally like the idea of getting 2 BS's. The question is getting the extra degree worth the extra cost and time. One year doesn't seem too bad. I do think an engineering BS is way more valuable than a physics BS in getting an industry job.

One thing to keep in mind is to go directly from a BS to a PhD program in physics. I'm pretty sure your undergrad loans are deferred if you go to graduate school. Then you wouldn't need the extra BS.
 
Diracula said:
No direct experience with it, but from what I've read about engineering physics it may fall short of what you are expecting on the physics end, since you want a phd eventually.
That surprises me a little. I reviewed a few engineering physics programs and there was over 10 upper division physics courses. I would think this would get you going in physics graduate school if someone chooses to.
 
It was just a guess, so if you have better info go with that. My thought was just that if you start substituting engineering courses for physics courses, then your value goes down for physics phd programs (even if it's just a little bit). Of course it would depend on the area of physics you are choosing.

When I went into my BS program for physics, engineering physics would not have been what I wanted at all, but that was just my own personal perspective back then.

Are engineering physics BS holders as attractive as say pure engineering BS holders for industry jobs? It would surprise me a little if this were true.
 
If you take 10 upper division physics courses, there is less time for engineering courses than if you took fewer. Be aware there is a tradeoff.

Loyola's dual-degree program is a 3-2 program. (For either Loyola) These are focused more on producing engineers than applicants to physics grad schools.
 
A lot of the new questions can be derived now. What would you recommend then, Vanadium? My biggest concern is funding my self for the Ph.D and I was thinking the dual degree will open more and better jobs but as V says it will sacrifice my physics. So a couple questions need to be pondered now:

How much is the physics sacrifice in the dual degree program and is it worth it?
Should I just take the B.S. in engineering physics or would I get the short end of both degrees?
How hard would it be to go back into academia once you have an engineer's job?
How does everyone else do this? take the B.S. in physics and take a chance? Or go straight into the Ph.D program, if so, what do you do about the money issue?

I'm of to do more research; I think the first question can be answered rather easily by comparing the dual degree to the regular physics program, right? Thank's for the help everyone. I have a feeling it's going to be coin toss in the end.
 
MainCharacter said:
How hard would it be to go back into academia once you have an engineer's job?

It depends on your drive, for most people it will be impossible. Not that that's a bad thing. Imagine going from 60k+ salary to 10k-20k (depending on the university), especially if you've started a family or have a mortgage.
 
  • #10
I've decided to try my luck with the b.s. in physics and see if I can get into grad school as a research or assistant to minimize the costs. If can't find any I'll stay an extra year and get the engineering degree and work my way around that way. Thanks for all the help folks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
528
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K